Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
366.  The brief did not refer to the fact that although the inspectors had found material
that had been procured illicitly, some of it related to permitted programmes including
missiles with ranges less than 150km.
367.  Mr Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary from May 1997 to June 2001 and then
Leader of the House of Commons, recorded that he had concluded Iraq did not
have weapons of mass destruction in the sense of weapons that could be used
against large-scale civilian targets.
368.  Mr Scarlett reported that Mr Cook had asked a number of questions during his
briefing on 20 February, including:
The “threat posed by battlefield CBW as opposed to missiles capable of hitting
civilian targets (e.g. cities) in foreign countries”.
Iraq’s “weaponisation capabilities”.
“Had containment worked?”
“Had Iraq’s WMD programmes had developed since 1998?”138
369.  Mr Scarlett added that he had:
“… made clear that Iraq had a range of battlefield systems capable of delivering
CBW. We assessed that Saddam was ready to use them, including against his
civilian population. Iraq might not have succeeded in developing CBW capable
warheads for the 150km ‘permitted’ missiles. We assessed that Iraq could deliver
CBW with the 650km missiles it retained; if only one of these hit home in favourable
conditions on an Israeli city (I might also have mentioned Kuwait), civilian casualties
would be large. I also made clear that Iraq’s programmes had not stood still since
1998 and had developed in all areas except perhaps the nuclear, where I reminded
him of what was in the public assessment.”
370.  Mr Cook wrote that the briefing from Mr Scarlett had lasted an hour, and “was
impressive in its integrity and shorn of the political slant with which No.10 encumbers
any intelligence assessment”.139 Mr Cook had concluded, “Saddam probably does not
have weapons of mass destruction in the sense of weapons that could be used against
large-scale civilian targets”.
371.  Asked if Mr Cook had challenged the briefing, Sir John Scarlett told the Inquiry:
“… he questioned me very closely on the assessment … He asked for more detail
than other Ministers did … he was an especially experienced Minister when it came
to the use of intelligence. He didn’t dispute what I was saying … Where he … took a
different view was on how he interpreted it …”140
138  Minute Scarlett to Powell, 18 June 2003, ‘Iraq/FAC: Robin Cook’.
139  Cook R. The Point of Departure. Simon & Schuster UK Ltd, 2003.
140  Private hearing, 5 May 2010, pages 83-84.
358
Previous page | Contents | Next page