Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.3  |  Iraq WMD assessments, October 2002 to March 2003
Iraq intended to declare a small part of its illegal programmes, and overload
UNMOVIC with large quantities of information on legitimate activities.
WMD were seen as vital to the regime’s survival, so a core WMD capability and
infrastructure must be retained.
Iraq was concerned about the provisions for conducting interviews of Iraqis
outside Iraq, which could expose illicit procurement.
There was concern about the potential destruction by the inspectors of
dual‑use facilities.
72.  Mr Scarlett commented that the concerns about exposing illicit procurement might
be referring to conventional weapons programmes and that the dual-use facilities
supported “the WMD programmes”.
73.  Mr Scarlett wrote that the intelligence confirmed earlier JIC judgements, including
the identification of “overload” as a potential strategy. There was no intelligence on which
illegal programmes might be declared.
74.  Mr Scarlett also drew attention to preparations to intimidate potential Iraqi
interviewees.
75.  Mr Scarlett’s other comments included the observations that there seemed to be:
“… an inconsistency in Iraq’s policy towards inspectors. The [intelligence] indicates
the regime plans to let the inspectors into any site. But it also indicates that the
regime must rethink a core WMD capability.”
76.  Mr Scarlett concluded that it was “possible” that Iraq was “so confident of its
concealment strategy that it believes inspectors will not discover prohibited activity.
Nonetheless, this [intelligence] is important in that it further confirms that ultimately the
Iraqi regime does not envisage having to accept genuine and complete disarmament,
and is confident in its ability to mislead inspectors.”
77.  The intelligence described by Mr Scarlett was based on reported comments,
including from someone with access to senior members of the Iraqi regime; but it was
not quoting Saddam Hussein’s views.
78.  Mr Alastair Campbell, Mr Blair’s Director of Communications and Strategy, wrote in
his diaries:
“There was some interesting stuff around on deception programmes, for example
[Iraqi] officials being forced to put papers and materials in their homes with the
warning that they and their families would be harmed if they were lost.”24
24  Campbell A & Hagerty B. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Volume 4. The Burden of Power: Countdown
to Iraq. Hutchinson, 2012.
305
Previous page | Contents | Next page