Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
859.  The Butler Report recommended that governments in the future should make
arrangements to avoid putting the JIC and its Chair into an area of public controversy
and offered suggestions as to how that might be achieved.453
860.  The Report stated:
“… we conclude that if intelligence is to be used more widely … in public
debate in future, those doing so must be careful to avoid its uses and
limitations. It will be essential too, that clearer and more effective dividing
lines between assessment and advocacy are established when doing so.”454
861.  The Government accepted the Committee’s conclusions on the public use of
intelligence in its immediate response to the report and subsequently stated that:
“Any future presentation of intelligence will separate the Government case from the
JIC Assessment.”455
Conclusions
862.  From late February 2002, the UK Government position was that Iraq was a
threat that had to be dealt with; that Iraq needed to disarm in accordance with the
obligations imposed by the UN; and that it was important to agree to the return of
UN inspectors to Iraq.
863.  The urgency and certainty with which the position was stated reflected
both the ingrained belief – that Saddam Hussein’s regime retained chemical
and biological warfare capabilities, was determined to preserve and if possible
enhance its capabilities, including at some point in the future a nuclear capability,
and was pursuing an active policy of deception and concealment – and the wider
context in which the policy was being discussed with the US.
864.  But it also served to fuel the demand that the Government should publish the
document it was known to have prepared, setting out the reasons why it was so
concerned about Iraq.
865.  In the spring and summer of 2002, senior officials and Ministers took the
view that the Iraq dossier should not be published until the way ahead on the
policy was clearer.
866.  By late August 2002, the Government was troubled by intense speculation
about whether a decision had already been taken to use military force. In
453  Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph 467.
454  Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph 467.
455  Cabinet Office, Review on Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction: Implementation of its
Conclusions, March 2005, Cm6492, paragraph 13.
280
Previous page | Contents | Next page