Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
848.  Mr Blair stated that it would only take Saddam Hussein “a year or two” to acquire
a usable nuclear weapon “if he were able to purchase fissile material illegally”, rather
than the fuller and more cautious assessment in the dossier (page 27) that Iraq would
need “essential components from foreign sources” to produce a warhead as well as
fissile material.
849.  Neither the dossier nor Mr Blair addressed the likelihood of Iraq being able to
procure both fissile material and other essential components.
850.  Mr Blair did not refer to the judgement in the dossier, which reflected the JIC
Assessments on the issue, that “while sanctions remain effective Iraq would not be able
to produce a nuclear weapon”.447 “If”, and only if, sanctions were removed or proved
ineffective, Iraq would then need “at least five years to produce sufficient fissile material
for a weapon”.
851.  Mr Blair also stated that Iraq’s ballistic missile programme was “required for
the delivery of chemical, biological and nuclear programmes” and that it was “clear
that a significant number of longer-range missiles were effectively concealed from the
previous inspectors and remain, including up to 20 extended-range SCUD missiles”.
Subsequently, he added that the ballistic missile capability was “being developed for
multi-purpose use, including with WMD warheads”.
852.  This material was in the draft of 23 September.
853.  The dossier (pages 22-23) stated that Iraq had a “variety of delivery means
available for both chemical and biological agents”. It made no statement about the
delivery of nuclear weapons.
854.  The dossier did not include the reference in the JIC Assessment of 9 September
2002 to an intelligence report that:
“… suggests Iraq has ‘lost’ the capability to develop warheads capable of effectively
disseminating chemical and biological agent and that it would take six months to
overcome the ‘technical difficulties’.”448
855.  There was no mention in the dossier of concealment of longer-range missiles,
other than Iraq’s retention of “up to 20 Al Hussein missiles”.449
447  Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. The Assessment of the British Government, 24 September 2002,
page 27.
448  JIC Assessment, 9 September 2002, ‘Iraqi Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons –
Possible Scenarios’.
449  Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. The Assessment of the British Government, 24 September 2002,
page 28.
278
Previous page | Contents | Next page