Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.2  |  Iraq WMD assessments, July to September 2002
“… [I]n the past four or five years the issue of Iraq, weapons inspections and
what to do about that regime has come over my desk pretty much week after
week … [I]t has been there as an issue the whole time … What we know now
from the assessment given by our Joint Intelligence Committee is that the very
thing that we feared is the very thing that the Iraqi regime is working on.”
“What has happened … is that, whether we like it our not, now is the point
of decision.”
“… We have to be clear that the consequences of saying now to Iraq that
we are not going to do anything will be really, really serious.”
“… [W]e have to make the decision, and I do not think we can duck the
consequences of that decision.”
824.  Mr Blair concluded that the threat was not that Saddam Hussein was going
to launch an attack on the UK “tomorrow”:
“… the threat is that within his own region, or outside it given the missile capability
that he is trying to develop, he launches an attack that threatens the stability of that
region and then the wider world. All the evidence that we have is that if there is such
a conflict in that region, we will not be able to stand apart from it.”
ACCURACY OF THE STATEMENT
825.  Mr Blair’s statement about Iraq’s capabilities and intentions included some
judgements that were additional to those in the dossier.
826.  Mr Blair’s categorical statement that the intelligence picture painted by the
JIC over the last four years was “extensive, detailed and authoritative”, was not
an accurate description of the intelligence underpinning the JIC’s assessments.
827.  There are a number of differences between the draft speech and Mr Blair’s
statement to the House of Commons where points of detail were added or changed,
but its structure and key arguments remained.
828.  In the statement, Mr Blair emphasised that the information in the dossier
represented the view of the JIC.
829.  During a debate on Iraq on 22 February 2007, Lord Butler said that Mr Blair’s
statement to Parliament “that the picture painted by our intelligence services was
‘extensive, detailed and authoritative’ … could simply not have been justified by the
material that the intelligence community provided to him.”
830.  The draft of Mr Blair’s statement on 23 September said that the intelligence
picture was “extensive and detailed”. The words “and authoritative” were added
in the final version; it is not clear who made that change or why.
275
Previous page | Contents | Next page