Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.2  |  Iraq WMD assessments, July to September 2002
733.  The dossier made clear that Iraq would not be able to develop a nuclear weapon
without procuring key equipment and material, but stated:
“Iraq continues to work on developing nuclear weapons in breach of its
obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty and in breach of UNSCR 687.
Uranium has been sought from Africa that has no civil nuclear application
in Iraq.”405
“… [T]here is intelligence that Iraq has sought the supply of significant quantities
of uranium from Africa.”406
734.  The FAC stated that the assertion in the September 2002 dossier should have
been qualified to “reflect the uncertainty” surrounding the evidence upon which it
was based.407
735.  The ISC took evidence from Sir Richard Dearlove on SIS judgements on the
reliability of its “two independent sources” for reporting in June and September 2002.408
While the IAEA had called into question documentary evidence it had received in
February 2003 and SIS was still conducting further investigations, the ISC reported
that it had been told that this “did not affect” SIS’ judgement of its second source and
its belief that Iraq was “attempting to negotiate the purchase of uranium from Niger”.
The ISC described the SIS judgement as reasonable.
736.  In its response to the FAC in November 2003, the FCO stated that: “the claim
in the September dossier rested on separate evidence to that judged fraudulent by
the IAEA”, and that this intelligence was still under review and had not been shared
with the CIA.409
737.  The Butler Review concluded that the “intelligence was credible” that Iraq had
sought to purchase uranium ore from Niger in 1999.410
738.  Iraqi officials had visited Niger in 1999 and further intelligence was received during
2002 which identified that the purpose of the visit had “been to negotiate the purchase
of uranium ore, although there was disagreement as to whether a sale had been agreed
and the uranium shipped”.411
405  Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. The Assessment of the British Government, 24 September 2002,
page 17.
406  Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. The Assessment of the British Government, 24 September 2002,
page 25.
407  Ninth Report from the Foreign Affairs Committee, Session 2002-2003, The Decision to go to War
in Iraq, HC 813-1.
408  Intelligence and Security Committee, Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and
Assessments, September 2003, Cm5972, paragraphs 89-93.
409  Ninth Report from the Foreign Affairs Committee, Session 2002-2003, The Decision to go to War in
Iraq, Response of the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Cm6062.
410  Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph 503.
411  Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraphs 493 and 495.
257
Previous page | Contents | Next page