Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.2  |  Iraq WMD assessments, July to September 2002
September 2003.319 The ISC stated that it had “looked at the supporting intelligence in
critical areas to ensure that the [JIC] Assessments reflected the intelligence correctly”.
592.  The Report of the Inquiry into the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of
Dr David L Kelly CMG by Lord Hutton (“The Hutton Inquiry”, HC 247), was published on
28 January 2004.320
593.  In relation to the question of whether the judgements were improperly influenced
by Mr Campbell or No.10, Lord Hutton concluded:
“Mr Campbell made it clear to Mr Scarlett on behalf of the Prime Minister that
10 Downing Street wanted the dossier to be worded to make as strong a case
as possible in relation to the threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s WMD, and
10 Downing Street made written suggestions to Mr Scarlett as to changes in 
the wording of the draft dossier which would strengthen it. But Mr Campbell
recognised, and told Mr Scarlett that 10 Downing Street recognised, that nothing
should be stated in the dossier with which the intelligence community were not
entirely happy.
“Mr Scarlett accepted some of the drafting amendments suggested to him by
10 Downing Street but he only accepted those suggestions which were consistent
with the intelligence known to the JIC and he rejected those suggestions which were
not consistent with such intelligence and the dossier … was approved by the JIC.
“As the dossier was one to be presented to, and read by, Parliament and the
public … I do not consider that it was improper for Mr Scarlett and the JIC to take
into account suggestions as to drafting made by 10 Downing Street and to adopt
those suggestions if they were consistent with the intelligence available to the JIC.
However I consider that the possibility cannot be completely ruled out that the desire
of the Prime Minister to have a dossier which, whilst consistent with the available
intelligence, was as strong as possible in relation to the threat posed by Saddam
Hussein’s WMD, may have subconsciously influenced Mr Scarlett and other
members of the JIC to make the wording of the dossier somewhat stronger than
it would have been if it had been contained in a normal JIC Assessment. Although
this possibility cannot be completely ruled out, I am satisfied that Mr Scarlett, the
other members of the JIC, and the members of the Assessment Staff engaged in
the drafting of the dossier were concerned to ensure that the contents of the dossier
were consistent with the intelligence available to the JIC.
“The term ‘sexed-up’ is a slang expression, the meaning of which lacks clarity in
the context of the discussion of the dossier. It is capable of two different meanings.
319  Intelligence and Security Committee, Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction – Intelligence and
Assessments, September 2003, Cm5972.
320  Report of the Inquiry into the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of Dr David L Kelly CMG
by Lord Hutton [“The Hutton Inquiry”], 28 January 2004, HC 247, pages 2-3.
227
Previous page | Contents | Next page