The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
would not
use CBW during the initial air phase of any military campaign, but
would use
CBW once a
ground invasion of Iraq has begun. Faced with the likelihood of
military
defeat and
being removed from power, we judge that it is unlikely there would
be a way
to deter
Saddam from using CBW.”
The JIC
judged that “several factors could influence the timing of a
decision …
to authorise
the use of CBW weapons”:
“•
the
availability of stocks of CW and BW agents;
•
the
survivability of … delivery means … Once a military campaign is
under way
the
pressure will increase to use certain assets before they are
destroyed;
•
the
survivability of command and control mechanisms … Intelligence
indicates
that
Saddam’s son Qusay may already have been given authority to order
the
use of CBW
… Saddam may … specify in advance … the specific conditions
in
which unit
commanders should use these weapons e.g. once Coalition
Forces
have
crossed a particular geographical line;
•
the
reliability of the units … Late in any campaign commanders may not
be
prepared to
use CBW if they judge that Saddam is about to fall.”
The JIC
also examined possible
scenarios for the use
of CBW weapons.
•
Before a
conflict – The JIC
stated that the aim “would be to incapacitate
or kill
Coalition troops in their concentration areas. Intelligence
indicates that
… Bahrain,
Jordan, Qatar, Israel and Kuwait” had been identified as
targets.
“Turkey
could also be at risk. Both chemical and biological weapons could
be
used … But
the use of CBW weapons carries serious risks and Saddam
will
weigh up
their military utility against the political costs. Use … would
expose the
lies and
deception … The early, widespread use of CBW or non-lethal
agents
would
affect Coalition military planning … On balance however we judge
that the
political
costs of using CBW weapons would outweigh the military
advantages
and that
Saddam would probably not use CBW … pre-emptively.”
•
During the
ground phase – “There is no
intelligence on specific Iraqi plans
for how
CBW would be used in a conflict. Large numbers of chemical
munitions
would need
to be used to make a battlefield impact. BW could also be
used
although it
is less effective as a tactical weapon … But the use of even
small
quantities
of chemical weapons would cause significant degradation in
Coalition
progress
and might contribute to redressing Coalition conventional
superiority
… Iraq
could make effective use of persistent chemical agents to shape
the
battlefield
… by denying space and territory to Coalition Forces.
Booby-traps
and
improvised explosive devices could be used … to inflict local
losses in urban
areas. It
is also possible that Saddam would seek to use chemical and
biological
munitions
against any internal uprising; intelligence indicates that he is
prepared
to
deliberately target the Shia population. One report indicates that
he would be
more likely
to use CBW against Western forces than on Arab
countries.”
•
Drawing Israel
into the conflict – “… One
intelligence report suggests that if
Saddam were
to use CBW, his first target would be Israel. Another …
suggests
that Iraq
believes Israel will respond with nuclear weapons if attacked with
CBW
or
conventional warheads. It is not clear if Saddam is deterred by
this threat or
judges it
to be unlikely in the face of US pressure on Israel not to take
such a
course
of action.”
160