Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
42.  The first was a document of almost 500 pages, “designed to provide a
comprehensive reference and briefing document” for use by government departments,
providing details of:
• Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological programmes and their potential means
of delivery, particularly ballistic missiles;
• procurement mechanisms in recent times;
• the critical goods which Iraq would require for WMD-related programmes;
• goods and technologies which Iraq was actively seeking;
• developments in indigenous military production; and
• Iraq’s conventional arms purchases.18
43.  The document replaced a version produced in 1996.
44.  A one-page summary of key judgements was provided, including:
• The location and condition of the concealed Al Hussein missiles was “unknown”,
but there was “sufficient engineering expertise to make them operational”.
• Iraq had “begun development” of ballistic missiles with a range of more than
1,000km, but it would “not be able to produce such a missile before 2007
provided sanctions remain effective”.
• Iraq was “continuing to carry out research into nuclear weapons development
at a theoretical level” and intelligence indicated that it might have recalled its
nuclear scientists from civilian work in 1998.
• Iraq might “be trying to develop centrifuge enrichment of uranium”, but that was
“likely to produce significant, if not insurmountable problems”.
• “Some clandestine procurement has been attempted abroad using foreign
front companies. Many ‘dual-use’ items such as machine tools and electrical
equipment have been acquired which would be available for the nuclear
programme.”
• It was assessed that Iraq had “no intention of restoring its CW agent production
to pre-Gulf Conflict levels” but it “could begin the production of mustard gas on
a significant scale at any time and the nerve agents sarin and VX within weeks”.
• It was assessed that Iraq was “continuing to conceal the full extent of its BW
programme in order to preserve a limited offensive capability and that it could
revive its BW programme within a matter of weeks without much difficulty or
outside assistance”.
• Iraq’s CBW production capability had “been dispersed to survive a military attack
and UN inspections”.
18  Paper Defence Intelligence Analysis Staff, August 2002, ‘Proliferation Study: Iraq’.
122
Previous page | Contents | Next page