Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
18.  Sir David also identified questions Mr Blair might ask, including what sort of
battlefield environment was anticipated, and the response to any use of biological
weapons (BW) or chemical weapons (CW).
19.  The record of the 23 July meeting written by Mr Matthew Rycroft, one of Mr Blair’s
two Private Secretaries for Foreign Affairs, noted:
Mr Scarlett summarised the intelligence and latest [4 July] JIC Assessment:
“Saddam’s regime was tough and based on extreme fear. The only way to
overthrow it was likely to be by massive military action.” Saddam Hussein was
“worried and expected an attack”, but he was “not convinced” that an attack
would be “immediate or overwhelming”. Real support for Saddam Hussein was
“probably narrowly based”.
Sir Richard Dearlove reported that there was “a perceptible shift in attitude”
in Washington: “Military action was now seen as inevitable.” President Bush
“wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction
of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around
the policy. The NSC [National Security Council] had no patience with the UN
route and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime’s record.”7
20.  Mr Rycroft recorded that the meeting concluded that the UK “should work on the
assumption that the UK would take part in any military action”. Mr Blair also asked for
further advice on a number of issues, including that Mr Scarlett would send Mr Blair
a full intelligence update.
21.  In a separate record circulated more widely in Whitehall, Mr Rycroft wrote that
it had been suggested that Mr Scarlett provide a weekly update, on Friday mornings
for Mr Blair’s weekend box.8
22.  In his account of the meeting in his diaries, Mr Campbell wrote, in relation to the
points made on WMD, that:
Mr Straw had “said of the four powers posing a potential threat with WMD …
Iraq would be fourth. He [Saddam Hussein] does not have nukes, he has some
offensive WMD capability. The tough question is whether this is just regime
change or is the issue WMD.”
Mr Blair “said he needed to be convinced first of the workability of the military
plan, and second of an equally workable political strategy. Jack [Straw] said
we could probably get the votes for a UN ultimatum, but the Americans may
not want to go down that route. TB saw regime change as the route to dealing
with WMD.”9
7  Minute Rycroft to Manning, 23 July 2002, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Meeting, 23 July’.
8  Letter Rycroft to McDonald, 23 July 2002, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Meeting, 23 July: Follow Up’.
9  Campbell A & Hagerty B. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Volume 4. The Burden of Power: Countdown
to Iraq. Hutchinson, 2012.
118
Previous page | Contents | Next page