4.1 |
Iraq WMD assessments, pre-July 2002
415.
Following
discussions in Washington, Mr Webb discussed the time Iraq
would
need to
acquire a nuclear weapon with Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, Chief of
the Defence
Staff
(CDS), and AM French on 20 March.181
416.
A DIS paper,
“What does Iraq need to do to get the bomb quickly?” was
produced
417.
Referring to
the Assessment of 15 March, the DIS stated:
“Although
there is very little intelligence, the JIC judges that Iraq is
still pursuing a
nuclear
weapons programme. Intelligence indicates that scientists were
recalled to
work on a
nuclear weapons programme in the autumn of 1998, but it is not
known
if large
scale development work has yet recommenced. Procurement of dual
use
items over
the last few years could be used in a uranium enrichment
programme.
But we have
no definitive intelligence that such items are intended for a
nuclear
programme.”
418.
Addressing the
question “What does Iraq have now?”, the DIS stated that
the
Atomic
Weapons Establishment (AWE) had concluded that Iraq had “made
significant
progress in
designing a nuclear device” before 1991:
“Many
aspects of a simple design had been studied, although the high
explosives
needed to
detonate the device had not been fully developed. More
sophisticated
concepts
were being considered to produce a smaller and lighter device,
capable of
missile
delivery, but it is unlikely that much progress has been made …
Iraq will have
retained
documents,
drawings and expertise.
“… Iraq
still needed to complete aspects of its design and, in particular,
to validate
the high
explosives system. It is unlikely that much of this would have been
done
before IAEA
inspectors left in December 1998 for fear of detection. However, if
all
the key
scientists had been recalled … they could have reconstituted the
programme
and
further
developed warhead designs since then.
This would not necessarily
have been
detected by intelligence.
“Iraq also
has some possible platforms
to deliver a suitable
nuclear device.
Its Russian
made jet aircraft … could probably be adapted [to] carry a
simple
nuclear bomb
… Any former SCUD missiles that could be assembled could
take
a more
sophisticated device. However, the remaining … Al Hussein
missiles
would not
be suitable.”
181
Minute CDI
to Policy Director, 21 March 2002, ‘Iraq – Nuclear
Weapons’.
182
Minute DIS
[junior official] to DI ST, 20 March 2002, ‘What does Iraq need to
do to get the bomb
quickly?’
89