Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.1  |  Iraq WMD assessments, pre-July 2002
415.  Following discussions in Washington, Mr Webb discussed the time Iraq would
need to acquire a nuclear weapon with Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, Chief of the Defence
Staff (CDS), and AM French on 20 March.181
416.  A DIS paper, “What does Iraq need to do to get the bomb quickly?” was produced
later that day.182
417.  Referring to the Assessment of 15 March, the DIS stated:
“Although there is very little intelligence, the JIC judges that Iraq is still pursuing a
nuclear weapons programme. Intelligence indicates that scientists were recalled to
work on a nuclear weapons programme in the autumn of 1998, but it is not known
if large scale development work has yet recommenced. Procurement of dual use
items over the last few years could be used in a uranium enrichment programme.
But we have no definitive intelligence that such items are intended for a nuclear
programme.”
418.  Addressing the question “What does Iraq have now?”, the DIS stated that the
Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) had concluded that Iraq had “made significant
progress in designing a nuclear device” before 1991:
“Many aspects of a simple design had been studied, although the high explosives
needed to detonate the device had not been fully developed. More sophisticated
concepts were being considered to produce a smaller and lighter device, capable of
missile delivery, but it is unlikely that much progress has been made … Iraq will have
retained documents, drawings and expertise.
“… Iraq still needed to complete aspects of its design and, in particular, to validate
the high explosives system. It is unlikely that much of this would have been done
before IAEA inspectors left in December 1998 for fear of detection. However, if all
the key scientists had been recalled … they could have reconstituted the programme
and further developed warhead designs since then. This would not necessarily
have been detected by intelligence.
“Iraq also has some possible platforms to deliver a suitable nuclear device.
Its Russian made jet aircraft … could probably be adapted [to] carry a simple
nuclear bomb … Any former SCUD missiles that could be assembled could take
a more sophisticated device. However, the remaining … Al Hussein missiles
would not be suitable.”
181  Minute CDI to Policy Director, 21 March 2002, ‘Iraq – Nuclear Weapons’.
182  Minute DIS [junior official] to DI ST, 20 March 2002, ‘What does Iraq need to do to get the bomb
quickly?’
89
Previous page | Contents | Next page