Previous page | Contents | Next page
4.1  |  Iraq WMD assessments, pre-July 2002
The JIC assessed that those quantities of agent “could produce significant
casualties”.
30.  The Assessment stated:
Iraq seems to be exploring the use of mobile facilities to give its biological
warfare activities greater security. The Iraqis had mobile … facilities for filling
chemical weapons at the time of the Gulf War. We know that senior Iraqis have
told UNSCOM that the use of mobile facilities was considered during the planning
of their one dedicated BW facility. But we have no other evidence for BW mobile
production centres. We judge that it would be technically feasible for Iraq to produce
20-30 tonnes of … BW agent … We have no evidence for Iraq filling weapons with
biological agent since the Gulf War. But for practical reasons, advance stockpiling of
some BW agents is less likely than for CW agents.
“In the light of this and other evidence of Iraqi illicit procurement of dual use
equipment and materials, we judge that Iraq is likely to be continuing to develop its
BW capabilities.”
31.  The Butler Report stated that the Key Judgement on Iraq’s biological warfare
activities was based on two new strands of evidence, and was somewhat more
firmly expressed than the subsequent analysis in the Assessment might bear.
32.  Considering the Assessment in 2004, the Butler Report stated that the firmer
assessment (that there was “clear evidence” of continuing BW activity) in the
Key Judgement:
“… was based on two new strands of evidence. The first was intelligence reports on
aspects of Iraqi research and development activities in 1997/1998. The second, and
more significant, was new intelligence from a liaison service received a few days
before the production of the JIC Assessment on the use by Iraq of mobile facilities to
produce biological agent.”
33.  The Butler Report stated that the language in the Assessment on mobile
laboratories:
“… was appropriate for a new source whose reporting had not by then been
validated although the Key Judgement was somewhat more firmly expressed than
the subsequent analysis in the Assessment might bear.”10
34.  Sir John Scarlett, Chairman of the JIC from September 2001 to July 2004, told the
Inquiry that the first report on mobile laboratories came through “in early 2000” and was
“reflected … if only briefly” in the Assessment in April 2000.11
10  Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction [“The Butler Report”], 14 July 2004, HC 898,
paragraph 239.
11  Private hearing, 5 May 2010, page 17.
15
Previous page | Contents | Next page