Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.8  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 8 to 20 March 2003
1010.  Mr Arias said Saddam Hussein was responsible for the suspension of inspections:
“Through his ongoing policy of deceit, concealment and delaying tactics, he has
decided to openly opt for the path of confrontation, contravening the interests of
his people and the demands of the Security Council.”
The draft resolution tabled by the US, UK and Spain was “designed to ratchet up the
pressure on the Iraqi regime” and had “in fact, offered Saddam Hussein another
opportunity”.
1011.  Mr Arias stated that resolution1441 recognised that Iraq’s non-compliance with
the Council’s resolutions constituted a threat to international peace and security; that the
Council had met “many times to examine successive reports of the inspectors”. Iraq had
“still not complied with the will of the international community as had been demanded …
Therefore, peace and security continue unassured.”
1012.  Mr Juan Gabriel Valdés, Chilean Permanent Representative to the UN, stated
that Chile had been convinced that “the inspections programme – strengthened, zealous
and investigative, carried to its logical conclusion and accompanied by growing and
persistent military pressure – was capable of achieving … the peaceful disarmament
of Iraq.” The Council:
“… needed to make clear to the regime of Saddam Hussein that the United Nations
would move towards the disarmament of Iraq at any cost. The Council should have
cultivated its internal unity …
“That was not possible. We fear that the consequences will be serious for humanity.
The Iraqi regime never understood the dimension of its lethargy and did not
appreciate the gravity of the punishment to which it was exposing its own people …
the Council was unable to find … the flexibility needed to set deadlines and to define
a path of collective action that would have enabled it to shoulder the responsibilities
entrusted to it by the Charter of the United Nations. Today, every one of us must
assume his part of the responsibility.”
1013.  Mr Valdés continued that it was “not the time for recriminations”; and that nothing
could be more serious than suspending the inspections process which “could create
doubts concerning the validity of this instrument”. He concluded:
“The Security Council … must now work tirelessly, inspired by the objective of
preserving life and restoring peace. Perhaps if we do everything that we can and
save as many lives as we can, the millions of people in the world who have now
lost faith in our capacity to make the world a civilised place may again lend their
inspiration to our tasks.”
1014.  Mr Helder Lucas, Angolan Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN,
deplored the “fact that the inspectors were unable to complete their task of disarming
Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction. Angola also deplored the “fact that Iraq was
581
Previous page | Contents | Next page