Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
no evidence provided of links with Al Qaida; he did not have the wherewithal to attack
the UK directly; and there had been “an awful lot of scaremongering”. The Government’s
“impatience” would “reap a whirlwind”.330
932.  In his speech, Mr Kennedy stated that he did “not believe that the case for war”
had been established, but he acknowledged that the Government deserved credit for
persuading a “reluctant” US “to go down the UN route” and for emphasising the primary
need for a “meaningful” MEPP.331 He also drew attention to Mr Annan’s remarks the
previous day, expressing concern about the legitimacy of action without the support
of the Security Council.
933.  Mr Kennedy concluded by drawing attention to the number of people who had
expressed concern about the “doctrine of regime change”, were “wary of the motives”
of the US Administration, and “did not like to see Britain separated from its natural
international allies”.
934.  More than fifty backbench MPs spoke in the debate, offering a wide range of
views about the prospect of military action.
935.  In his speech closing the debate, Mr Straw drew attention to the importance of
a just and lasting settlement of the dispute between Israel and Palestine, which was,
“as important for the future stability of the region as the disarmament of Iraq’s weapons
of mass destruction”.332
936.  In relation to Iraq, Mr Straw drew attention to the recommendations of the Select
Committee on International Development, including the need for a new UN Security
Council resolution “to provide proper authority for reconstruction and redevelopment
work, and, in addition, a proper mandate for any Government who are to operate within
the territory of Iraq once Saddam Hussein is removed”.
937.  Mr Straw stated that the House of Commons had never before had the
opportunity to vote on a substantive motion for its explicit support for the use of the
Armed Forces. That placed “a heavy responsibility” on each member of the House.
938.  Mr Straw added that the choice was “not easy”. He had “worked for months
for a peaceful resolution of the crisis”, and he was as certain as he could be “that the
Government’s course of action was right”.
939.  Mr Straw also stated:
“… no one, either today or in New York in the four Security Council meetings
that I attended, has … claim[ed] that Saddam Hussein has fulfilled the full and
immediate compliance that was required of him.”
330  House of Commons, Official Report, 18 March 2003, columns 779-781.
331  House of Commons, Official Report, 18 March 2003, columns 781-787.
332  House of Commons, Official Report, 18 March 2003, columns 896-902.
568
Previous page | Contents | Next page