The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
no evidence
provided of links with Al Qaida; he did not have the wherewithal to
attack
the UK
directly; and there had been “an awful lot of scaremongering”. The
Government’s
“impatience”
would “reap a whirlwind”.330
932.
In his speech,
Mr Kennedy stated that he did “not believe that the case for
war”
had been
established, but he acknowledged that the Government deserved
credit for
persuading
a “reluctant” US “to go down the UN route” and for emphasising the
primary
need for a
“meaningful” MEPP.331
He also
drew attention to Mr Annan’s remarks the
previous
day, expressing concern about the legitimacy of action without the
support
of the
Security Council.
933.
Mr Kennedy
concluded by drawing attention to the number of people who
had
expressed
concern about the “doctrine of regime change”, were “wary of the
motives”
of the US
Administration, and “did not like to see Britain separated from its
natural
international
allies”.
934.
More than
fifty backbench MPs spoke in the debate, offering a wide range
of
views about
the prospect of military action.
935.
In his speech
closing the debate, Mr Straw drew attention to the importance
of
a just
and lasting settlement of the dispute between Israel and Palestine,
which was,
“as important
for the future stability of the region as the disarmament of Iraq’s
weapons
936.
In relation to
Iraq, Mr Straw drew attention to the recommendations of the
Select
Committee
on International Development, including the need for a new UN
Security
Council
resolution “to provide proper authority for reconstruction and
redevelopment
work, and,
in addition, a proper mandate for any Government who are to operate
within
the
territory of Iraq once Saddam Hussein is removed”.
937.
Mr Straw
stated that the House of Commons had never before had
the
opportunity
to vote on a substantive motion for its explicit support for the
use of the
Armed
Forces. That placed “a heavy responsibility” on each member of the
House.
938.
Mr Straw
added that the choice was “not easy”. He had “worked for
months
for a
peaceful resolution of the crisis”, and he was as certain as he
could be “that the
Government’s
course of action was right”.
939.
Mr Straw
also stated:
•
“… no one,
either today or in New York in the four Security Council
meetings
that I
attended, has … claim[ed] that Saddam Hussein has fulfilled the
full and
immediate
compliance that was required of him.”
330
House of
Commons, Official
Report, 18 March
2003, columns 779-781.
331
House of
Commons, Official
Report, 18 March
2003, columns 781-787.
332
House of
Commons, Official
Report, 18 March
2003, columns 896-902.
568