Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
798.  The Government had tried its “utmost”, and had “tabled a draft … resolution,
amended it, and then been prepared to apply tests against which Iraq’s co-operation …
could be judged”. Although the UK had been “gathering increasing support from
members of the Security Council”, the French statement “that they would veto a
resolution in all circumstances had made it impossible to achieve a new … resolution”.
France, with Russia in support, “were not prepared to accept” that if Saddam Hussein
“did not comply with the United Nations obligations, military action should follow”.
The UK was in a situation it had “striven to avoid”: “There would be no second resolution
and military action was likely to be necessary … to enforce compliance by Saddam
Hussein with Iraq’s obligations.”
799.  Mr Blair stated that the US “had now undertaken to produce a ‘Road Map’ for the
Middle East Peace Process, once the new Palestinian Prime Minister’s appointment
had been confirmed”. That would “open the way to a full and final settlement within
three years”. The US “had also confirmed” that it “would seek a UN mandate for the
post-conflict reconstruction of Iraq”, and: “Oil revenues would be administered under
the UN’s authority.”
800.  Mr Blair stated:
“A lot of work was needed to repair the strains which had arisen internationally over
the past few weeks. He regretted that the international community had sent mixed
messages to Saddam Hussein, whose regime could have been disarmed peacefully
if confronted by international solidarity. The blockage we had encountered in the
United Nations impeded any progress.”
801.  Mr Straw said that Mr Blair:
“… had persuaded President Bush … to go down the United Nations route in order
to achieve the maximum authority for the disarmament of Iraq, but the diplomatic
process was now at an end.”
802.  Mr Straw added:
“Progress had been made towards forging a consensus before the French and
Russians had indicated their intention to veto any Security Council resolution
proposed which indicated that military action would follow Saddam Hussein’s failure
to comply. His assessment was that President Chirac of France had decided to open
up a strategic divide between France and the United Kingdom; the row in Brussels
in late 2002 had been manufactured. Effectively, one member of the Security
Council had torpedoed the whole process.”
803.  Mr Straw concluded:
“… the one chance now remaining to Saddam Hussein was to seek exile. If that
course failed, the Government would seek the support of the House of Commons
540
Previous page | Contents | Next page