Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
728.  The FCO reported that Mr Ivanov had stated that Russia wanted to continue
working under the aegis of the Security Council. The Council should discuss Dr Blix’s
report, which constituted a real action plan for Iraq’s disarmament, in its meeting on
19 March. He would attend that meeting. The Azores meeting represented the views
of only three states; it could not replace a Security Council meeting. No single country
had the right to stop the work of the weapons inspectors, whose authority came from
the UN. Recalling an assurance from Mr Blair to President Putin before the adoption
of resolution 1441 that it did not imply the automatic use of force, Mr Ivanov stated
that Russia’s main condition remained that the Security Council should vote on any
resolution sanctioning military action.
SIR JEREMY GREENSTOCK’S ANNOUNCEMENT, 17 MARCH 2003
729.  At “about 3.15pm UK time” on 17 March, Sir Jeremy Greenstock announced
that the resolution would not be put to a vote, stating that the co-sponsors
reserved the right to take their own steps to secure the disarmament of Iraq.
730.  At “about 3.15pm UK time”,253 Sir Jeremy Greenstock made a statement
announcing that the UK, the US and Spain, as co-sponsors of the draft resolution,
would not be pursuing a vote on it.254
731.  Sir Jeremy stated:
“… we have worked very hard in the last few days in a final effort to seek a Council
consensus on Iraq. In an effort to reunite the Council the United Kingdom proposed
last week an ultimatum which would challenge Iraq to take a strategic decision
to disarm.
“There were three key elements to the compromise we proposed …
“Having held further discussions with Council Members over the weekend and in the
last few hours, we have had to conclude that Council consensus will not be possible
… One country in particular has underlined its intention to veto any ultimatum ‘no
matter what the circumstances’. That country rejected our proposed compromise
before even the Iraqi government itself and has put forward suggestions that would
row back on the unanimous agreement of the Council in 1441 – those suggestions
would amount to no ultimatum/no pressure/and no disarmament.
“The communiqués and press statements that issued at the Azores Summit explain
the positions of our governments … The co-sponsors reserve their right to take their
own steps to secure the disarmament of Iraq.”
253  House of Commons, Official Report, 17 March 2003, column 703.
254  Telegram 465 UKMIS New York to FCO London, 18 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Resolution: Statement’.
528
Previous page | Contents | Next page