Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.8  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 8 to 20 March 2003
466.  Later in the conversation, Mr Straw:
“… briefly described the importance of the UK’s new benchmarks. Unless Iraq
realised it was facing its final, final chance, the international community would not
get Iraq to face reality. Put bluntly, delay played into the hands of those in the US
who said we should not go down the UN route. That said, he was happy to see
new propositions at any time.”
467.  Mr de Villepin concluded that “a way forward could be found”. Mr Straw replied
that “there would have to be discussion of these issues at Heads of Government level,
though not in New York”.
468.  The UK Embassy in Paris reported that Mr de Villepin had followed his rejection
of the UK’s proposals on 13 March with a briefing emphasising France’s wish to find a
solution leading to consensus in the Security Council and referring to his conversation
with Mr Straw.141
469.  Asked to confirm that France did not exclude an ultimatum, a senior French
Foreign Ministry official had, however, been “adamant: any ultimatum that did not leave
the final decision to the Security Council constituted a red line … The French were open
to any solution that enabled inspections to continue.” The official had claimed that a
failed attempt to get a second resolution would annul the effects of the first resolution;
the Council would have refused to authorise military intervention and any intervention
would be outside the Charter and “at the limit of aggression”.
470.  The Embassy concluded that Mr de Villepin’s position was “a tactical move
intended to deflect criticism” of President Chirac’s announcement of a veto “‘whatever
the circumstances”: “It was too little, too late – and the French know it.”
MINISTERIAL MEETING TO DISCUSS THE MILITARY PLAN
471.  Mr Blair agreed the military plan later on 13 March.
472.  On 13 March, Mr Blair held a meeting, with Mr Prescott, Mr Straw, Mr Hoon
and Adm Boyce to discuss the timing of the start of the military campaign and formal
approval of the military plan set out in Mr Watkins’ letter of 11 March (see Section 6.2).142
There was “a discussion about the timing of the end of the UN process … and the
start of military action”. It was agreed that Mr Blair would pursue the timing issues with
President Bush.
141  Telegram 130 Paris to FCO London, 14 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Quai Views’.
142  Letter Rycroft to Watkins, 13 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Military Planning’.
481
Previous page | Contents | Next page