Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
It would “make sense for UNMOVIC to identify some priorities” within the
clusters. He suggested VX, anthrax and SCUD missiles.
“… just three months of inspections was ‘not fully satisfactory’ as a decent
amount of time to give the inspections effort. But that was a Council decision.”
If the Council voted for war, there would be a long term monitoring requirement.
It would be for the Council to decide whether UNMOVIC should go back and
on what terms.
841.  Dr Blix subsequently told the UK Mission that he could and would make the
clusters document available for the Security Council meeting on 7 March. But
preparation of the work programme and key remaining tasks would not be ready by then.
842.  The UK Mission also reported that Ambassador James Cunningham, US Deputy
Permanent Representative to the UN, had:
said he was “not opposed to surfacing the clusters document … provided it was
not accompanied by the list of key remaining tasks”; and
agreed that, “after any conflict, US forces should certainly be accompanied
by UNMOVIC inspectors to witness the uncovering of WMD and missiles.
But there was Pentagon resistance … and, if the resolution failed to pass,
giving UNMOVIC a role could be a difficult argument.”
843.  The UK continued to provide information to UNMOVIC on potential targets for
inspection but, by late February, it was “less confident about these than some of the
previous targets”.256
UNMOVIC report, 28 February 2003
UNMOVIC issued its quarterly report to the Security Council on 28 February.257
The UK Permanent Mission to the UN in New York reported that UNMOVIC had
concluded that Iraq had been helpful on process but there was no explicit conclusion
on substance.258
Other points included:
The “clusters” document could serve as an important source for the selection of
key remaining tasks.
Verified disarmament would be “problematic” without co-operation and even with
co-operation it would take some time.
Results in terms of disarmament had been very limited so far.
256  Minute DI ACR [junior official] to DDI CPSG et al, 25 February 2003, ‘Proposed Targets for UNMOVIC
Briefing – 26/27 February 2003’.
257  UN Security Council, 28 February 2003, ‘Note by the Secretary General’ (S/2003/232).
258  Telegram 323 UKMIS New York to FCO London, 28 February 2003, ‘Iraq: UNMOVIC Quarterly Report’.
330
Previous page | Contents | Next page