Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
694.  The UK strategy was set out in a telegram from Mr Ricketts to diplomatic posts
on the evening of 21 February.198 The key points were:
“The present plan is to table a simple draft resolution in the Security Council,
probably on 24 February. This would provide the … legal authority for military action
if necessary. We would make clear that it was part of a strategy to give Iraq another
short period in which to demonstrate finally and fully whether it was co-operating in
order to achieve voluntary disarmament of its WMD. We would … not be seeking a
vote … for another two weeks or so, but were not prepared for the process to string
out in the absence of a clear will by Iraq to comply with 1441.
“… we would expect several further rounds of discussion in the Security Council
… culminating in a report by the inspectors to a meeting on or around 7 March,
probably attended by Foreign Ministers.”
695.  Mr Ricketts advised that there would be an intensive lobbying campaign of the
elected members of the Security Council with a “good deal of travel by Ministers”.
The campaign would be co-ordinated with the US and Spain. The FCO would be setting
up a system to “provide an up-date at least twice a week while the crisis remains at its
present pitch”, and was producing a daily “core script” for media purposes.
696.  In a letter to Mr Campbell about statements over the weekend of 22 and
23 February, Mr Straw advised against any reference to either an “ultimatum” or to
“benchmarks”.199 Mr Straw explained that the US was hostile to the use of the former
term because “it would cut across a real ultimatum which President Bush had in mind
to issue at about the time the resolution was voted – to Saddam to ‘get out of town’”.
697.  On benchmarks, there was:
“… a trap here for us to avoid. If we are too specific about how we judge Saddam’s
compliance, we set ourselves up as a target, both from Saddam but also from Blix.
Saddam will know what he appears to have to do to get ticks in the right boxes.
Judging from the Prime Minister’s conversation with Blix yesterday, I think Blix is
also in the mood to say if he possibly can that Iraq has passed any benchmarks
that we offer. Most of the members of the Security Council will look to Blix for
their judgement.”
698.  In his diaries, Mr Campbell wrote that, on 21 February, Mr Blair, who was on his
way to Rome, had called him to say that “everything now had to be set in the context
of pushing for peace, that we wanted to resolve it peacefully”. Mr Campbell had worked
with the White House on a briefing note. Mr Blair and Mr Straw had been happy to
include a reference to an ultimatum until Mr Straw spoke to Secretary Powell “who
198  Telegram 16 FCO London to UKREP Brussels, 21 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Next Steps at the UN’.
199  Letter Straw to Campbell, 21 February 2003, ‘Choreography of Statements over the Weekend’.
302
Previous page | Contents | Next page