Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“It would be paradoxical and absurd if 250,000 men were to invade Iraq and find
very little.”
655.  Mr Blair responded: “our intelligence was clear that Saddam had reconstituted
his WMD programme”.
656.  The record stated that Dr Blix had “concluded that he accepted the need
for timelines and benchmarks”.
657.  In his account of the conversation, Dr Blix wrote that he had said:
“Only at three sites to which we had gone on the basis of intelligence had there been
any result at all.
“Personally I tended to think that Iraq still concealed weapons of mass destruction,
but I needed evidence. Perhaps there were not many such weapons in Iraq
after all.”179
658.  After the conversation between Mr Blair and Dr Blix, Sir David Manning told
Dr Rice that while Dr Blix had understood the key point that Iraq was not co-operating
fully with the UN, it was “equally clear that he was not ready to say so to the Security
Council”.180 The need was therefore to keep him focused on this question of co‑operation
and “persuade him that the logic of the situation was that we should now issue an
ultimatum”. Dr Blix would need to decide whether “he was going to be a party to the
pretence that Iraq was co-operating with the UN system when, in fact, Saddam’s
defiance risked wrecking it”.
659.  Sir David also recorded US/UK agreement to table a second resolution
on 24 February and the UK’s preference for the “very light” resolution proposed
by Sir Jeremy Greenstock. There would be a need to prepare the launch carefully
with members of the E10 and potential allies in the Security Council.
660.  Asked about his response to Dr Blix’s comment about the implications of invading
Iraq and finding “very little”, Mr Blair told the Inquiry that he had told Dr Blix: “What you
have to tell us is … whether he is complying with the resolution. Is he giving immediate
compliance and full compliance or not?” Dr Blix’s answer was: “No, but, you never know,
it may be that, if we are given more time, he will.”181
661.  Mr Blair added that the conversation had led to him working with Dr Blix “to try and
get a fresh … resolution. I kept working on that right up until the last moment.”
179  Blix H. The Search for Weapons of Mass Destruction: Disarming Iraq. Bloomsbury Publishing
Plc, 2005.
180  Letter Manning to McDonald, 20 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Condi Rice’.
181  Public hearing, 29 January 2010, pages 112-113.
296
Previous page | Contents | Next page