Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
523.  Mr Campbell wrote in his diaries that, at the No.10 morning meeting
on 17 February, Mr Blair “was keen on a major upgrade of our communications
and believed we could win the argument as set out at the weekend”.142
524.  An extraordinary meeting of the European Council to discuss Iraq on
17 February pledged “full support” to Security Council efforts and to work with
partners, “especially the United States”, to disarm Iraq.
525.  Mr Annan appealed for transatlantic unity and patient persuasive diplomacy
behind closed doors. The UN would be seriously weakened if action was taken
without its authority.
526.  The discussion of Foreign Ministers addressed the objective of disarmament
rather than regime change, the need for a second resolution whilst the inspections were
continuing, the consequences of military action, and the role of the EU, its relationship
with the US and its credibility.143
527.  Mr Straw said:
“… what was at stake was the future of multilateralism in a unipolar world. France
emphasised the power of words but not the power of action. Europe was very
multilateralist in decision-making but not so when it came to action. There were
essentially three fundamental issues involved: Iraq remained a threat to international
security; the only reason that inspections were taking place was because of military
pressure on Saddam; and Iraq was not complying. The EU would not be having this
discussion unless the US and the UK were willing to pay for this military build up and
put their troops on the line. They could not stay there forever but that did not mean
that events were being driven by a military timetable.”
528.  Mr Annan’s address to the Council was reported as “uncompromising in putting
the onus on Saddam to implement resolution 1441; and to implement it swiftly”.144
If the Security Council managed the current crisis successfully, it would emerge with
its authority enhanced. But if it failed, and action was taken without its authority, the UN
would be seriously weakened. If Iraq were allowed to defy the Security Council because
the international community failed to impose itself, the foundations of collective security
would be gravely undermined. An effective international security system depended
on the Council and on its determination to take action in even the most difficult cases.
529.  Mr Annan had appealed for transatlantic unity and patient persuasive diplomacy
behind closed doors to build a common front. The greater the degree of consensus
142  Campbell A & Hagerty B. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Volume 4. The Burden of Power: Countdown
to Iraq. Hutchinson, 2012.
143  Telegram [un-numbered] UKREP Brussels to FCO London, 17 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Special European
Council, 17 February: Foreign Ministers Discussion’.
144  Telegram 178 UKREP Brussels to FCO London, 18 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Special European Council,
17 February: Discussion with UNSG Annan’.
274
Previous page | Contents | Next page