Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
487.  Sir Jeremy suggested that elements in the ultimatum should “either test the
French idea to destruction … or give the inspectors a real chance to deliver a judgement
which will convince six more Council members”. Dr Blix could play a role: “There
should be room to move him to a firmer approach which raises the chances of the
inspectors achieving more.” Sir Jeremy reported that Dr Blix was interested in ideas
for more vigorous inspections “though downbeat about the amount of time available
from the US”.
488.  Sir Jeremy concluded:
“If we and the US are true to our pronouncements of force as a last resort, bringing
the Americans back to their mid-September approach as a last gasp before pressing
the plunger at least has a certain logical force.”
489.  Sir David Manning proposed a resolution setting a deadline of 14 March for
Saddam Hussein to demonstrate that he was complying fully with resolution 1441,
after which he would be in further material breach.
490.  Sir David envisaged that military action would not begin until late March,
giving 10 days for Arab leaders to persuade Saddam Hussein to depart.
491.  The resolution should specify what compliance meant. That would set
the bar at a level it would be difficult for Saddam Hussein to reach and prevent
equivocation in the inspectors’ reports.
492.  France would seek to block the resolution and to string out inspections
indefinitely.
493.  Sir David Manning advised Mr Blair on 16 February that Dr Blix’s careful “fence
sitting” in his report to the Security Council had:
“… encouraged the wishful thinkers and procrastinators. For the moment, there
is almost certainly a Security Council majority for letting the inspections run, not
for moving to early military action.”132
494.  Sir David advised that it would be necessary “to go on making the argument that
the issue is compliance. Our best bet may be to concede a little more time while issuing
an ultimatum.”
495.  Sir David set out a proposal along the lines suggested by Mr Ricketts to Mr Straw,
including a second resolution “stipulating that unless Blix reports on 14 March that
Saddam is in full, unqualified, unequivocal compliance with 1441, he will be in further
material breach”. There would then be an immediate vote after Dr Blix reported.
132  Minute Manning to Prime Minister, 16 February 2003, ‘Iraq: Way Forward’.
268
Previous page | Contents | Next page