Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
187.  Other key elements from the Assessment were:
There were suggestions that UK interests were “on a par with US targets
for some Islamist terrorists” although it was “likely that the US” would “remain
the priority for most”.
The threat of a “conventional’ attack” in the UK remained “a major concern”.
The “threat of CB attacks in the UK” remained; they “would probably be
small-scale (but potentially high impact)”.
There had been “a particularly high number of threat reports” during the previous
“two months”, although “only a small proportion” would “materialise into terrorist
action”.
The “upward trend” was “likely to continue” as a possible conflict with Iraq
approached.
Usama Bin Laden’s statement of 11 February was “unlikely to be the trigger
for attacks by Islamist extremists”, although it would “enable him to take credit
for attacks conducted in response to a war with Iraq”.
188.  An update of the 10 February Assessment, of terrorist activity which would
be triggered by military action in Iraq, was produced by the JIC on 12 March.50 That
is addressed in Section 3.8.
UK consideration of the timing and tactics for a second resolution
189.  The FCO advised No.10 on 10 February that only four votes in the Security
Council could be counted on for a second resolution. It would be impossible
to obtain support for a resolution explicitly authorising the use of “all necessary
means” to disarm Iraq.
190.  The key element in the resolution would be a sufficient link to resolution
1441 to establish that the Security Council has concluded that Iraq had failed
to take its final opportunity.
191.  The FCO identified three options and planned to discuss the approach with
the US before tabling a draft resolution following Dr Blix and Dr ElBaradei’s report
to the Security Council on 14 February.
192.  On 7 February, Mr Peter Ricketts, FCO Political Director, reported to Mr Straw
that the UK’s strategy on Iraq was approaching “the critical phase”.51 Sir Jeremy
Greenstock had advised that here was “no prospect” of getting an explicit “all necessary
means” provision in a resolution. Lord Goldsmith had been consulted about more
implicit options.
50  JIC Assessment, 12 March 2003, ‘International Terrorism: War with Iraq: Update’.
51  Minute Ricketts to Private Secretary [FCO], 7 February 2003, ‘Iraq Strategy’.
216
Previous page | Contents | Next page