Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.6  |  Development of UK strategy and options, November 2002 to January 2003
848.  The MOD “line to take” suggested for Mr Blair was that, if military operations were
to be delayed beyond April/May, the UK would “struggle to put together this scale of
force again for the autumn, especially if the fire strike continues. So militarily we could
bear some delay but not too much.”
849.  The background briefing for Mr Blair advised that, if operations were not initiated
in the spring, the UK would “face some awkward choices”. Some “key elements of
the UK contribution were unique” – including the Commando Brigade, the Air Assault
Brigade and a specialist helicopter carrier ship. The MOD suggested:
“If operations were not going to start until the autumn, we would need to consider
bringing some forces back to the UK in the meantime. Our ability to provide a
major contribution later in the year will also be severely constrained if the fire strike
continues beyond the spring.”
850.  The MOD also advised Mr Blair that agreement on the objectives for a military
campaign would be needed. The development of the UK’s objectives and the discussion
of the legal basis for the conduct of military operations are addressed in Section 6.2.
851.  In relation to targeting, the “line to take” offered to Mr Blair was that the UK was
“working up our strategic objectives for a military campaign. We need to relate this
to the legal base we establish.” It was “Very important that UK and US objectives are
aligned soon and in advance of commitment to action so that we can come to a clear
and common understanding on targeting issues and the information campaign.”
That would need “careful handling domestically”.
852.  The background briefing for Mr Blair explained that the current thinking was that
the objectives would be published “close to, or at the start of hostilities”. The MOD
explained that the military objectives would enable it to “satisfy” itself “that they
represent[ed] minimum use of force as required by international law”, and to use the
CDS Directive to indicate “what military missions are legitimate, including … what
targets we can legitimately attack from the air; and plan information operations”.
853.  A “publicly agreed set of aligned military objectives”, being prepared by the
Cabinet Office, would enable the UK to participate in a “joined up information
operations campaign”.
FCO ADVICE, 30 JANUARY 2003
854.  The FCO focused on the need for more time in the hope of disarming
Iraq without military action and, if that was not possible, support for a second
resolution.
155
Previous page | Contents | Next page