Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.6  |  Development of UK strategy and options, November 2002 to January 2003
648.  Mr Blair also said that “A big debate was developing over the value of the
inspections route.” He would “report back to colleagues on the outcome” of his meeting
with President Bush.
649.  Sir Richard Dearlove advised on 23 January that the US had “in effect” taken
the decision to use force against Iraq.
650.  In response to a request from Mr Blair for briefing on US planning, Sir Richard
Dearlove’s Private Secretary sent Sir David Manning an update, advising that a decision
had “in effect” been taken to use force against Iraq.221 The US military would be ready
in mid‑February.
MR BLAIR’S NOTE TO PRESIDENT BUSH, 24 JANUARY 2003
651.  In a Note to President Bush on 24 January, Mr Blair told President Bush that
the need for a second resolution was overwhelming, and that inspectors should
be given until the end of March or early April to carry out their task.
652.  Mr Blair suggested that, in the absence of a “smoking gun”, Dr Blix would
be able to harden up his findings on the basis of a pattern of non‑co‑operation
from Iraq and that would be sufficient for support for military action in the
Security Council.
653.  In addition, Mr Blair framed his argument in the context that extra time would
be crucial to make a better case and work up coherent plans for the “aftermath”
of a conflict and to secure international support.
654.  Mr Blair sent a Note to President Bush on 24 January, setting out the dilemma,
as he saw it, in the absence of a “smoking gun”.222
655.  Addressing the question “What’s the problem?”, Mr Blair wrote:
“If we delay, we risk Saddam messing us about, sucking us back into a game of hide
and seek with the Inspectors where, unless they find ‘the smoking gun’, the thing
drags on for ever until we give up or get distracted.
“On the other hand, at present there is not support for a second UN resolution; and
Blix is not yet in a clear and unambiguous position on Iraqi non‑co‑operation.”
656.  Mr Blair wrote that the arguments for proceeding with the second resolution, “or at
the very least a clear statement” from Dr Blix which allowed the US and UK to argue that
a failure to pass a second resolution was in breach of the spirit of 1441, remained in his
view, overwhelming. He cited six reasons:
It would be “the best protection” in the event of “a military hitch” or a
protracted campaign.
221  Letter PS/C to Manning, 23 January 2003, [untitled].
222  Letter Manning to Rice, 24 January 2003, [untitled], attaching Note [Blair to Bush], [undated], ‘Note’.
115
Previous page | Contents | Next page