Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
502.  On Iraq, he wrote:
“We need to go back to the basic principle: the UN has made a decision; that
decision must be upheld. The inspectors inspect; if they find a breach, then the UN
should pass a new resolution. If it does, how can anyone dispute the case for war?
If the UN doesn’t, despite a breach, then we are in the same positions as we were
at the time of Kosovo. But the integrity of the UN process has to be upheld.
“We have two immediate weaknesses in our case:
people think we will go to war even if no breach is found. That is not correct.
people don’t really believe WMD or Saddam are real threats.”
503.  Mr Ricketts was in Washington on 13 January.176 He reported to Mr Straw’s
Private Secretary that his overriding impression was that:
“… there is still a good deal of uncertainty and confusion, but that all accept we are
entering a critical four weeks, in which the tensions between the political/UN track
and the military build‑up will come to a head … the President is getting impatient
and wants a basis for moving against Iraq sooner rather than later.
“There are conflicting pressures in all directions … the press are full of the
drum‑beat of military build‑up. With the sense that war is close, people want to rally
round the President. On the other hand there is still a lot of uneasiness … White
House letters are running nine to one against the war.
“… there will be big pressure on President Bush to say something powerful in the
State of the Union message on 28 January. I was assured … this would not be a
declaration of war. But equally no‑one thinks that he will want the present uncertainty
to drag on … there is no work in hand on how to sustain the present strategy over
a period of months.
“Blix will be the fulcrum in the coming weeks … All I talked to were determined not
to allow Saddam to put us back in the position where the onus was on the inspectors
to find something …”
504.  Mr Ricketts reported that the US was considering a presentation setting out
“the evidence of Saddam’s bad faith” soon after 27 January to “challenge the Security
Council to go for a second resolution”. Views amongst US officials on the wisdom of that
were mixed.
505.  Mr Ricketts’ minute was copied to Sir David Manning and others.
506.  In the context of a “flurry of comment … in the UK media” and Mr Blair’s press
conference later that day, Sir David told Dr Rice on 13 January that Mr Blair would point
176  Minute Ricketts to Private Secretary [FCO], 14 January 2003, ‘Iraq: The Mood in Washington’.
90
Previous page | Contents | Next page