Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
405.  On inspections, Sir David advised:
“My sense is that the Americans are close to giving up hope that UNMOVIC can
deliver results. We should urge them to stick with it. UNMOVIC only reached full
strength at Christmas … The inspectors needed targeted support; and time to build
up operating skills. Even so, it’s true that the chances of them finding a smoking gun
are relatively small which is why we need a defector if we can get one. But this too,
needs time.
“The Americans are in a hurry; perhaps too much of one. This colours their
approach to UNMOVIC and makes them impatient … Too much looks like hurried
improvisation, half thought out strategy, with fingers crossed that Saddam will
collapse in short order …”
406.  Sir David concluded that there was a danger of the US being driven by the tempo
of the military build‑up and understandable preference to fight in the spring not the
summer. In his view, “more time” was needed “to build the case against Saddam and
improve the odds for a second resolution”.
407.  In a manuscript note on Mr Straw’s letter of 3 January, Sir David Manning told
Mr Blair that Washington was “aware of the pitfalls and thinking in terms of a second
resolution”.144
408.  Sir David Manning discussed potential developments before Dr Blix’s report to the
Security Council on 27 January with Dr Rice on 3 January. “Emphasising that he was
speaking personally”, he told Dr Rice that he was:
“… convinced that we needed a second resolution; and that we would only get one
if we could produce convincing evidence that Saddam was in breach. Supposition
would not be enough. Apart from the problem of the Security Council, we would not
be able to get endorsement from the House of Commons for military action …”145
409.  Sir David suggested the pursuit of a three‑part policy:
compiling a register of intelligence reports that pointed to specific locations
where Saddam Hussein might be hiding WMD, or documents relevant to
the WMD programme, and trying “to persuade Dr Blix to mount co‑ordinated
surprise inspections [...] It was much too early to assume that the inspection
route would yield nothing”;
urging Dr Blix to state publicly that there were numerous gaps and unanswered
questions in the declaration: “By demanding that Saddam produce the missing
pieces we would be putting the pressure back on him in a way which his
apologists would find difficult to counter”; and
144  Manuscript comment Manning to PM, 3 January 2003, on Minute Straw to Prime Minister, 3 January
2003, ‘Iraq – Plan B’.
145  Letter Manning to McDonald, 3 January 2003, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Condi Rice’.
74
Previous page | Contents | Next page