Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
110.  In response to a question from Mr Doug Henderson (Labour) about whether action
without the express authority of the UN would lack “international political legitimacy” and
“severely damage” the UN and NATO, Mr Blair responded that it “would all depend on
the circumstances”. In Kosovo, action had been taken “outside the UN because there
was an unreasonable blockage against action being taken”. Mr Blair did not believe that
the Security Council would “get to that point” on Iraq: “The countries that signed up to
the deal at the United Nations know that if there is a breach by Saddam we have to act.”
111.  Asked by Mr Alan Simpson (Labour) for an assurance that, before he committed
“any British troops or support to such a war” Mr Blair would seek a specific mandate
through the UN and a specific vote in advance from the House of Commons, Mr Blair
replied that Mr Straw would “deal with both points” in the debate on resolution 1441 later
that day.
112.  In response to a question from Mr Tam Dalyell (Labour) about the effect of
discussion in the Security Council and if it would have “the final judgement”, Mr Blair
replied that it would “be for the weapons inspectors to say whether there is a breach”,
and that there would then be “a discussion about the seriousness of that breach”.
“All that” the UK had been “saying throughout” was that “the implication is that if there is
a significant breach, there must be action”. There was an “international consensus” that
it was “not sensible to tie ourselves down to every single set of circumstances, that we
want to keep some freedom of manoeuvre and that we should keep maximum pressure
on Saddam”.
113.  Mr Blair added:
“President Bush made a principled and difficult decision to go through the United
Nations. He was right to do that. We supported him strongly and we are now obliged
to ensure that the UN route works. I believe that we can do it in a way that avoids
conflict, if at all possible.”
114.  Mr Blair’s statement was repeated in the House of Lords.36 No major issues on Iraq
were raised.
115.  An Oral Question on the UK’s policy on Iraq had been answered earlier that
afternoon when a number of issues, including who would be responsible for determining
a material breach, the potential consequences in the region of military action in Iraq, and
the need for an effective and well‑planned exit were raised.37
36  House of Lords, Official Report, 25 November 2002, columns 597‑604.
37  House of Lords, Official Report, 25 November 2002, columns 557‑560.
24
Previous page | Contents | Next page