Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.6  |  Development of UK strategy and options, November 2002 to January 2003
12.  Mr Blair used an interview with the Arabic Service of Radio Monte Carlo on
14 November to send a message to Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi people and the Arab
world that it was Saddam Hussein’s fault that the people of Iraq were not enjoying real
wealth and prosperity.3 He declared that the objective of the United Nations resolution
was disarmament not regime change.
13.  Mr Blair emphasised that Saddam Hussein’s duty was to co‑operate fully with the
inspectors by providing an “honest declaration [of Iraq’s proscribed capabilities]” and
then to co‑operate in eradicating them. Mr Blair added that if Saddam did not disarm the
consequence would be that he would be “disarmed by force”. The choice for Saddam
Hussein was “very, very clear”.
14.  Mr Blair also stated that weapons of mass destruction and terrorism were two
separate, but linked issues that had to be dealt with:
“… if we allow countries which have got repressive and brutal regimes to develop
these weapons, at some point they will use them, and that is why we have got to
take the action.”
Cabinet, 14 November 2002
15.  Mr Straw told Cabinet on 14 November that while the Security Council
would need to be reconvened to discuss any breach in the event of Iraqi
non‑compliance, the key aspect of resolution 1441 was that military action could
be taken without a further resolution.
16.  Mr Straw told Cabinet on 14 November that Iraq was required to accept the terms
of resolution 1441 by the end of that week. Iraq had sent the UN a tirade of abuse but
the response was nevertheless positive.4 The requirement for Iraq to make a declaration
of its holdings of weapons of mass destruction and the facilities for developing
such weapons was more important. The new inspection regime would start work by
23 December.
17.  Mr Straw stated that a “key aspect of the resolution was that there was no
requirement for a second resolution before action was taken against Iraq in the event
of its non‑compliance, although reconvening the Security Council to discuss any breach
was clearly stated”.
18.  Mr Blair concluded that “the Iraq regime was under pressure and the leadership was
concerned about the reliability of internal support”.
19.  The issue of whether assurances to Cabinet that military action could be taken
without a further resolution accurately reflected the position of Lord Goldsmith at that
time is addressed in Section 5.
3  The National Archives, 14 November 2002, Prime Minister gives interview to Radio Monte Carlo.
4  Cabinet Conclusions, 14 November 2002.
7
Previous page | Contents | Next page