Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.5  |  Development of UK strategy and options, September to November 2002 –
the negotiation of resolution 1441
1084.  A new resolution would not have been required to permit UNMOVIC and
the IAEA to operate in Iraq. The UK and the US had, however, already agreed that
the provisions of resolution 1284 (1999) were no longer sufficient to secure the
disarmament of Iraq and a strengthened inspections regime would be required.
A new resolution would maintain the pressure on Iraq and define a more intrusive
inspections regime allowing the inspectors unconditional and unrestricted access
to all Iraqi facilities.
1085.  Iraq’s letters of 16 and 19 September to the Security Council declaring
that Iraq was “totally clear of all nuclear, chemical and biological weapons” and
Saddam Hussein’s rebuttal of suggestions that Iraq might share such weapons
with Al Qaida were immediately discounted. In response to Iraq’s detailed rebuttal
of the UK dossier, the Assessments Staff concluded that there was no need for
a full reply to Iraq’s claims.
1086.  The negotiation of resolution 1441 reflected a broad consensus in the
United Nations Security Council on the need to achieve the disarmament of Iraq.
1087.  There were, however, significant differences between the US and UK
positions: and between them and China, France and Russia about the substance
of the strategy to be adopted, including the role of the Security Council in
determining whether peaceful means had been exhausted and the use of force
to secure disarmament was justified.
1088.  Those differences resulted in difficult negotiations over more than
eight weeks before the eventual unanimous adoption of resolution 1441 on
8 November 2002.
1089.  In September and October 2002 negotiations were being conducted
simultaneously at three separate levels: discussions between Heads of State and
Government and their advisers; between foreign ministers; and in New York.
1090.  The degree to which Mr Blair, Mr Straw and Sir David Manning, and their
counterparts in other capitals, were directly engaged in the detailed negotiations
with counterparts in other capitals was highly unusual and demonstrated the
difficulty and political sensitivity of the issues under discussion.
1091.  Mr Blair played an active role in determining the UK’s negotiating strategy
and seeking to influence President Bush, President Chirac and President Putin.
1092.  Within the UK’s overarching objective, the initial discussion of the
resolution focused on the crucial need to revive UN authority to permit UK use
of military force if coercive diplomacy failed.
1093.  Mr Blair was advised that it would be impossible to get agreement in the
Security Council to a single resolution unequivocally providing that authority.
387
Previous page | Contents | Next page