Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
The objectives would also need to “evolve with changing circumstances”.
Mr Bowen stated that the paper was not intended for publication: if Mr Blair was content,
Sir David would “no doubt … arrange for it to be sent to DOP [Defence and Overseas
Policy Sub-Committee of Cabinet] colleagues” (see Section 2).
Mr Bowen’s advice was also sent to Sir David Omand, Cabinet Office Permanent
Secretary and Security and Intelligence Co‑ordinator, Mr Scarlett, and to officials in the
FCO, the MOD and the Home Office.
Mr Ian Lee, MOD, Director General Operational Policy, sent a copy of the draft to
Mr Hoon’s Private Office, commenting that while the text was “helpful” it did not “go far
enough in providing direction for current military activity and an information strategy”.228
Mr Lee did not expect the draft to move forward until there was a clear UN position.
Pointing out that there was “a good deal of contingency planning work going on in
Whitehall to support action in the United Nations on Iraq”, Sir David Manning wrote on
22 October to Mr McDonald and the Private Secretaries of DOP members to inform them
that Mr Blair had approved the objectives enclosed with his letter, which “should help
guide work in Departments for current phase of activity”.229
The letter was also sent to the Private Secretaries to Mr David Blunkett (the Home
Secretary), Mr John Prescott and Mrs Margaret Beckett (the Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs Secretary).
The objectives were unchanged from those proposed by Mr Bowen on 4 October.
The draft objectives underpinned subsequent policy statements both to explain the UK’s
position and to maintain the pressure on Saddam Hussein to comply with the demands of
the international community.
Mr Straw formally announced the UK’s objectives on 7 January 2003 (see Section 3.6).230
Discussion of the US/UK draft resolution of 23 October 2002
675.  A telegram from the British Embassy Paris on 21 October, recorded that there was
“universally positive” coverage in the French media of President Chirac’s firm stance on
Iraq, including a threat of the “first use of France’s veto since Suez” and suggestions that
he had forced US concessions over a two‑step approach.231 The media also reported
some details of the textual negotiations.
676.  President Chirac’s stance was cited as the main reason for the jump in his
popularity in the latest opinion poll from 52 percent in September to 57 percent.
President Chirac was also given credit for the paragraph on Iraq in the Francophone
Summit conclusions “defending multilateralism, the primacy of international law and
the pivotal role of the UN”.
228 Minute Lee to PS/Secretary of State [MOD], 7 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Strategic Policy Objectives’.
229 Letter Manning to McDonald, 22 October 2002, ‘Iraq’ attaching Paper Cabinet Office, ‘Iraq: Strategic
Policy Objectives’.
230 House of Commons, Official Report, 7 January 2003, columns 4‑6WS.
231 Telegram 609 Paris to FCO London, 21 October 2002, ‘Iraq: French views: Chirac Riding High’.
320
Previous page | Contents | Next page