Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.5  |  Development of UK strategy and options, September to November 2002 –
the negotiation of resolution 1441
The UK’s draft strategic objectives
The preliminary objective for UK policy in Iraq agreed by Mr Straw and Mr Hoon in May,
and recorded in Mr Hoon’s minute to Mr Blair of 31 May 2002 (see Section 3.3), was
revised in October 2002.
Mr Stephen Wright, FCO Deputy Under Secretary Defence and Intelligence, told the first
FCO co‑ordination meeting on 6 September that, following a conversation with the Chiefs
of Staff, he thought more work needed to be done on strategic campaign objectives.224
Mr Bowen sent a draft to Sir David Manning on 4 October, explaining that “Whitehall would
find it helpful” to agree objectives “for the present phase of activity” and, “in particular, it
would help us in formulating an information strategy”.225
The draft stated that the UK’s prime objective was:
“… to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and their associated
programmes and means of delivery, including prohibited ballistic missiles (BM) … in
accordance with United Nations Security Council resolutions … an expression of the
will of the international community, with which Iraq has persistently failed to comply,
thereby perpetuating the threat to international peace and security.”
Other objectives included the desired end‑state for Iraq,226 to which “and providing
effective and representative government for its own people” had been added; and
restoring the authority of the UN. The draft also stated that: “Success in achieving
our prime objective should help deter the proliferation of WMD and B[allistic] M[issiles]
more generally.”
The Cabinet Office draft identified the immediate priorities as:
achieving “a tough new UNSCR”;
the return of inspectors to Iraq “under conditions which enable them to identify and
eliminate prohibited WMD/BM material, associated equipment and activity”;
enabling UNMOVIC and the IAEA to institute a regime of long‑term monitoring and
verification measures to ensure compliance;
maintaining “international solidarity behind the UN Security Council and support
for effective … action” by UNMOVIC and the IAEA;
preserving regional stability; and
continuing to “make military plans and preparations in case military action” was
required to “force compliance with UNSCRs”.227
Mr Bowen advised that some had argued that the aspirations for the future of Iraq should
be translated into the main objective. He had resisted:
“… on the grounds that our purpose has been plainly stated by the Prime Minister
as disarmament and because the effective implementation of that policy does not
necessarily deliver our wider aspirations”.
224 Minute [FCO junior official] to Grey [sic], 6 September 2002, ‘Iraq Coordination Meeting’.
225 Minute Bowen to Manning, 4 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Strategic Policy Objectives’.
226 Agreed by Mr Straw and Mr Hoon in May 2002 and included in the Cabinet Office paper of 19 July,
‘Iraq: Creating the Conditions for Military Action’, which was discussed by Ministers on 23 July.
227 Minute Bowen to Manning, 4 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Strategic Policy Objectives’.
319
Previous page | Contents | Next page