Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.5  |  Development of UK strategy and options, September to November 2002 –
the negotiation of resolution 1441
549.  Mr Levitte concluded the Council was discussing:
“… the future of the international order, relations between North and South, and
notably, our relationship with the Arab world. An action of uncertain legitimacy … that
does not enjoy the support of the international community, would not be understood
and could gravely affect these relations.
“By placing this action within the framework of collective security, the French
approach aims to ensure its legitimacy and effectiveness, while respecting the
principles defined by the United Nations Charter.”
550.  In his opening remarks, Mr Sergei Lavrov, Russian Permanent Representative
to the UN, stated:
“For almost 12 years now, the international community has sought a way to settle
the Iraqi situation. Throughout that time the Security Council has adopted more than
50 resolutions and endured several severe crises. The current ongoing impasse is
rooted not only in the position of the Iraqi side, although we are far from condoning
Baghdad’s behaviour, while the need for Iraq to meet all its obligations … has been
frequently alluded to … We fully support such assessments. At the same time, in a
number of instances the Security Council has been unable to hold up its own end
with respect to an objective assessment of the situation and to meeting its own
obligations to work for a comprehensive settlement …”
551.  After making similar remarks to Mr Levitte on the overall achievements of the
inspectors, Mr Lavrov stated that it was unfortunate that the Council “was not able
to recognise” the opinion of the IAEA in 1998 that its task could be converted into a
“long‑term monitoring regime”. That conclusion had been supported in a letter from
Dr ElBaradei to the President of the Council on 14 October, which had “clearly indicated”
there were “no outstanding unresolved nuclear issues requiring further clarification”.
Mr Lavrov added that:
There was a “virtually complete picture of the missile situation”.
A “significant portion of the stocks of chemical weapons” had been destroyed,
“although there were some outstanding issues requiring further clarification”.
The “largest problems persisted in the biological sphere”.
“But on these issues and all the outstanding issues, solutions were possible.
At any rate, documents of the former UNSCOM testify that such was the case.”
“In December 1998 the head of the former UNSCOM [Dr Richard Butler]
provoked a crisis, arbitrarily withdrawing inspectors from Iraq without the
approval of the Security Council. His report came to the Security Council only
after [the] United States and the United Kingdom had launched military strikes
against Iraq.”
299
Previous page | Contents | Next page