The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
“an
alternative legal base i.e. that action was necessary to prevent an
overwhelming
humanitarian
catastrophe (by analogy with the 1991 action in Northern Iraq to
help the
Kurds)”.
Mr Ricketts commented:
“… that
would not be credible grounds for action this time. So far as I can
see, failure
to get a
second resolution would leave us with no plausible legal
basis.”
367.
In a
manuscript comment in the margin of Mr Ricketts’ minute, Sir
David Manning
wrote:
“What about the reference in OP1 to ‘material
breach’?”126
368.
It is not
clear whether Sir David had seen the minute before his
conversation
with Dr Rice.
369.
On 4 October,
Sir David Manning reported that the US Administration was not
yet
willing to
discuss detailed draft texts with the French.127
Secretary
Powell would discuss
“concepts”
with Mr de Villepin. The instinct was to move cautiously and
to take time to
see if
agreement was possible. The US was also considering changes to the
proposed
text of
OP10.
370.
In his
conversation with Mr de Villepin on 4 October, Mr Straw
stated that: we had
to find out
the extent of the problem with Iraq and its WMD by getting the
inspectors
back.128
We had got
as far as we had with the Iraqis by threatening force. We
would
prefer to
resolve the problem peacefully. If this was not possible we would
use force.
371.
Mr Straw
and Mr de Villepin agreed officials should
discuss.
372.
Mr Straw
spoke twice to Secretary Powell on 4 October. In the
second
conversation
he told Secretary Powell that there was “no parallel” with the
Kosovo
373.
FCO Legal
Advisers continued to voice concerns about the absence of
a
clear
statement from the Security Council reviving the authority for the
use of
force, and
that Lord Goldsmith’s views would be needed once the language
in
the draft
resolution on that point had been firmed up.
374.
On 4 October,
in a minute copied to Sir Jeremy Greenstock among others,
Mr John
Grainger,
FCO Legal Counsellor, expressed concerns that the current draft
resolution
126
Manuscript
comment Manning on Minute Ricketts to Private Secretary [FCO], 3
October 2002,
‘Iraq: Resolutions:
The “Kosovo Option”’.
127
Letter
Manning to McDonald, 4 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Condi
Rice’.
128
Telegram
213 FCO to Paris, 4 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Foreign Secretary’s
Conversation with French
Foreign
Minister, 4 October’.
129
Telegram
521 FCO London to Washington, 4 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Foreign
Secretary’s Conversation
with US
Secretary of State, 4 October’.
264