Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
threat, the strategic decision that this was a better course than unilateral action was
right. It would be “important to show that we were serious about allowing the UN to
do its business”.
112.  Following that meeting, Sir David Manning told Dr Rice that Mr Blair and Mr Straw
were “pleased that the new draft resolution focused on the destruction of Iraq’s WMD,
and the regime that would govern UNMOVIC inspections. This was the right place to
be but there was one area of the draft in particular that continued to give us serious
difficulties.”33 That was the stipulation that Iraq must make a declaration of its holdings
within 15 days of the passage of the resolution. He and Dr Rice had discussed the
issues many times, including the likely response of other Security Council members.
They discussed the language on that point and in the final operative paragraphs [OPs]
and the regime for inspections.
113.  Reporting the discussions Sir David Manning wrote that he had been assured that
the resolution was not a “trigger” for military action and that he had told Dr Rice that he
expected the discussions on the resolution to be difficult:
“They would be particularly resistant to the reference in OP10 to ‘… authorises
Member States to use all necessary means’. We were very unlikely to get this, even
though we should press it to see how the other Security Council members reacted.
Condi agreed. She said that the Administration was privately prepared to concede
this and settle for something like ‘serious consequences’.”
114.  Sir David concluded that the UK had “done as much as we can in the last 48 hours
to get the resolution into something approaching a plausible shape”. The UK would now
have to wait to see the reactions to the draft.
Agreement to offer UK military forces to the US for planning purposes
115.  On 20 September, the MOD sought Mr Blair’s agreement to offer Package 3
as a “possible add‑on” to the US “for planning purposes”.
116.  In parallel with the discussions on a new UN resolution, military planning continued
although knowledge was kept to a very tight group of people and the sensitivities about
potential leaks remained.
117.  In response to a minute from Mr Jim Drummond, Assistant Head of OD Sec
(Foreign Policy), primarily about military planning which Mr Drummond had classified
‘Confidential’, Sir David Manning commented: “Please ensure all minuting is Secret and
Personal – and keep circulation to [the] barest minimum.”34
33 Letter Manning to McDonald, 23 September 2002, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Condi Rice’.
34 Manuscript comment Manning on Minute Drummond to Manning, 16 September 2002,
‘Iraq: Pigott Meeting’.
218
Previous page | Contents | Next page