Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
70.  The key points of the UK position were:
… scepticism. Iraq has a long history of playing games. The … offer comes only
four days after Iraq rejected inspections;
Not clear what, exactly, the Iraqi letter amounts to …
Note Iraqi reference to discussion of practical arrangements for inspections.
Iraq must not be allowed to drag this process out. A new UNSCR [UN Security
Council resolution] would need to address this point …
Offer does not make clear that Iraq has accepted our basic demand, namely
to grant inspectors immediate access to any site, building, records, personnel
at any time of UNMOVIC’s choosing …
We must keep up the pressure on Iraq. Their latest offer has only come because
the international community has demonstrated its determination to stand firm.
We must continue to do so.
We must, therefore, work for a new UNSC resolution …
History tells us that we cannot trust Saddam’s word. This time, our goal is to
ensure that he complies with UNSC demands.”
71.  Mr Blair and President Bush decided to continue to pursue a new Security
Council resolution.
72.  Mr Blair and President Bush discussed the position on 18 September.21
73.  Mr Blair said that they should stick to the strategy. A resolution was needed and
the inspectors must be allowed in to do their job properly. Mr Blair was sceptical about
whether Saddam would comply: “It was obvious that Saddam would play games.
He had only made his offer on inspections … because he felt under pressure.” The
pressure would need to be continued.
74.  Mr Blair and President Bush also discussed the need for a new inspections regime
that was unconditional and unrestricted. Mr Blair’s view was that:
“This time we must be clear that obstruction would mean military action. This had to
be a disarmament process. There could be no mindset of accepting conditions …”
75.  Mr Blair stated that, in relation to the overall strategy, Saddam Hussein was “trying
to drag us into a negotiation”, and that the UN route provided the means to deprive
him of the argument that the US would attack him whatever he did. Mr Blair said that
disarmament “would occur, either through inspections or military action” and that the
“choice was Saddam’s”. In Mr Blair’s view, the Iraqi regime “could crack with the arrival
of inspectors”. Keeping up the public pressure would give the international community
“no option but to support us”.
21 Letter Rycroft to Sedwill, 18 September 2002, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Phone Call with President Bush,
18 September’.
212
Previous page | Contents | Next page