Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
497.  Sir David advised that, despite his prodding, the UK did not know what
President Bush would say in his speech on 12 September. Mr Blair might have
to speak to President Bush again “to try to hold him to the Camp David conclusions”.
498.  Sir David subsequently informed Dr Rice that Mr Blair’s position was that
Iraq must be made a challenge to the whole international community through a UN
resolution which required intrusive inspections; that they were an indispensable
part of the strategy; and that if the UN route was proposed with real conviction,
support could be secured.
499.  Sir David spoke again to Dr Rice on the evening of 10 September conveying
Mr Blair’s:
“… very strong view that we must make Iraq a challenge to the whole international
community. We must do so through a UN resolution that … provided for an intrusive
inspection regime. The inspectors were an indispensable part of the strategy.
Saddam would either refuse to let the inspectors back, or he would let them in
but almost certainly obstruct their operations. We should then be in a very strong
position to insist on action. You [Mr Blair] believed that we should deal with Iraq step
by step. We needed to get this resolution under our belt, put the onus squarely on
Saddam, and then decide what to do in the light of his reaction.”154
500.  Sir David added that it was “essential” that a resolution was put forward:
“… with conviction and made it absolutely clear that we wanted it to succeed.
We should be emphasising at every turn that war was the last resort. The US
Administration would have the worst of both worlds if it appeared to have been
forced reluctantly to choose the UN route, or if it appeared to want a new resolution
to serve as nothing more than a pretext for early military action.”
501.  Sir David added that it was “increasingly” Mr Blair’s:
“… impression that public opinion would come round if we proposed the UN route
with real conviction. If and when it became clear that Saddam had yet again violated
the will of the UN and the international community, there was a real chance that we
could build wide support for further action. But if we failed to do this, and it appeared
that Washington wanted to go the unilateral route, the international community would
be resistant or hostile to action. Securing wide support would be a great prize, one
that you [Mr Blair] believed was in reach.”
154 Minute Manning to Prime Minister, 11 September 2002, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Condi Rice’.
178
Previous page | Contents | Next page