Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Net Assessment, published by the International
Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) on 9 September.145
Mr Blair’s speech to the TUC, 10 September 2002
461.  In his speech to the TUC on 10 September, Mr Blair argued that the threat
posed by Iraq was not imminent but it had to be dealt with before it could
“erupt and engulf us all”.
462.  As he had planned in his minute of 30 August, Mr Blair set out the rationale for
tackling the problem of Iraq – “why I say Saddam is a threat that has to be dealt with” –
in the first section of his speech to the TUC on 10 September.146
463.  In the speech, Mr Blair elaborated many of the points he had made in his press
conference on 3 September. Mr Blair argued that Saddam Hussein’s actions in starting
wars of aggression, using chemical weapons against his own people and oppressing
them made his regime:
“With the Taliban gone … unrivalled as the world’s worst regime …
“Given that history … to allow him to use the weapons he has or to get the
weapons he wants would be an act of gross irresponsibility and we should not
countenance it.”
464.  Mr Blair stated that “when the weapons inspectors were evicted from Iraq in 1998
there were still enough chemical and biological weapons remaining to devastate the
entire Gulf region”. He also stated that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear programme,
which he had denied and which had been “disrupted” by inspections. He was in breach
of “23 outstanding UN obligations requiring him to admit inspectors and disarm”.
465.  Containment had worked “up to a point”, but sanctions were eroding and Saddam
Hussein was getting around US$3bn a year through illicit trade which he was “almost
certainly” using for his weapons programmes. British and American pilots were risking
their lives to police the No‑Fly Zones; and that couldn’t “go on for ever”.
466.  Addressing the way ahead, Mr Blair stated that it was right to deal with Iraq through
the UN; it was the will of the UN that Saddam was flouting. The challenge for “all in the
UN” was “to resolve the threat from Saddam not avoid it”. Mr Blair added:
“Let it be clear that he must be disarmed. Let it be clear that there can be no more
conditions, no more games, no more prevaricating, no more undermining of the UN’s
authority.
“Let it be clear that should the will of the UN be ignored, action will follow. Diplomacy
is vital. But when dealing with dictators … diplomacy has to be backed by the certain
145 IISS Dossier, 9 September 2002, Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Net Assessment.
146 The Guardian, 10 September 2002, Full text of Tony Blair’s TUC address.
172
Previous page | Contents | Next page