Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.4  |  Development of UK strategy and options, late July to 14 September 2002
404.  The meeting at Camp David was in two parts.130
405.  Mr Blair, supported by Sir David Manning, discussed Iraq with President Bush,
Vice President Cheney and Dr Rice from 1600 to 1745. Sir David Manning recorded that
it was a “remarkable” meeting. President Bush had congratulated Mr Blair on his speech
at Sedgefield.
406.  During the meeting, the arguments for taking the issue to the UN, the type of
resolution, the attitude of other members of the Security Council, the relationship with
the MEPP, and aspects of a military campaign and the “morning after”, were discussed
in depth.
407.  Mr Blair said that he was in no doubt about the need to deal with Saddam Hussein;
and that the likelihood was that this would mean military action at some point. The
immediate issue was “how to maximise the chance of resolving the Saddam dilemma
quickly and cleanly”. It was possible that sustained pressure would lead to his quick
collapse, but “we could certainly not count on it”. That might “in part” depend on “winning
the propaganda battle” and securing wide international support:
“If it came to force, we could hope that we would secure the relatively quick
overthrow of Saddam. But even if we did, we would still be faced with the big issue
of what followed his departure.”
408.  There would be even more difficult problems if Saddam Hussein did not collapse
quickly. We should not assume that there would be a quick collapse in Iraq as there had
been with the Taliban in Afghanistan.
409.  Mr Blair stated that the position of the international community made it important
to bring the issue back to the UN and secure a new Security Council resolution. Indeed,
two resolutions might be necessary: one setting conditions and one stipulating action
when Saddam failed to meet them. Without a resolution, military action would have little
or no international backing.
410.  Later, Mr Blair recognised that the two resolution route offered a better chance of
setting tough initial demands, but with a risk of difficulties in securing a second resolution
authorising action. In a discussion about how a breach would be established and the
need to avoid a long debate, Mr Blair said: “If Saddam was obviously in breach we
would know, and we had to be ready to move.” On balance, Mr Blair favoured a tough
initial resolution leaving open the option of going back to the UN for a second resolution,
if and when Saddam were in breach.
130 Minute Manning to Prime Minister, 8 September 2002, ‘Your Visit to Camp David on 7 September:
Conversation with President Bush’.
163
Previous page | Contents | Next page