Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
support for what is likely to be a very protracted post‑war phase, than for the
attack itself. Afghanistan has shown that the US is not good at consolidating
politically what it has achieved militarily.”
337.  Sir Christopher commented:
“The Prime Minister will have very clear ideas how he wants to play Iraq with Bush.
I would say only that it is more important to get it right than to do it fast. Bush’s head
will agree. But his heart is impatient, he fears being labelled a wimp like his father,
and his emotions will be stirred by the approach of the 9/11 anniversary.”
There would be “pressure on Bush to elide the distinction” between the two positions.
President Chirac’s views, 6 September 2002
338.  President Chirac told Mr Blair that the inspectors had to return to Iraq
immediately with full powers and they needed to be intelligent. He would support
that sort of resolution.
339.  The disadvantages of any US unilateralism would be much greater than the
advantages.
340.  In a conversation with President Chirac on 6 September, Mr Blair asked for his
views in advance of the meeting with President Bush.109
341.  President Chirac’s response was reported to have included:
Iraq had been “systematically and stupidly provoked … into getting rid of the
inspectors”.
He did not think Saddam Hussein “posed an immediate nuclear danger, but
clearly there were CBW risks”.
The inspectors had to return immediately, but in the current climate Mr Annan
should give Iraq an assurance that the inspectors were real, not spies.
The inspectors must have full powers, but they needed to be intelligent.
342.  President Chirac told Mr Blair that France would support that sort of UN resolution,
but if that did not work, there were two scenarios:
The US could attack Iraq on its own initiative but, “France would not participate,
‘since we are against unilateralism and do not want to feed anti‑Americanism’,
and because it would be dangerous militarily especially if Saddam had CBW.
It would not lead to the right result. There was a risk of Iraq blowing up in the
absence of a serious opposition figure to take power. The disadvantages would
109 Letter Rycroft to Sedwill, 6 September 2002, ‘Iraq and MEPP: Prime Minister’s Phone Call with
President Chirac, 6 September’.
154
Previous page | Contents | Next page