Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.4  |  Development of UK strategy and options, late July to 14 September 2002
were preliminary thoughts … you [Mr Blair] would want to explore the pros and
cons of an ultimatum, and its timing, when you saw [President] Bush tomorrow.”
323.  Dr Rice did not contest Sir David’s points. She told him that “the current plan” was
for President Bush’s speech at the UN General Assembly to “focus on a clear demand
that Iraq must forswear WMD” which would be “accompanied by an announcement” that
the US would be tabling a draft resolution.
324.  Sir David reported that current White House thinking on the core points for the
resolution included:
full “WMD disarmament under the international supervision of the Security
Council”;
“unrestricted access for UNMOVIC”;
freedom for “witnesses” to the WMD programme to leave Iraq and be
interviewed by UNMOVIC “at any time”;
empowerment for inspectors “to destroy any prohibited material they
discovered”;
“force protection” for UNMOVIC; and
Iraqi agreement to no‑fly and no‑drive zones as required.
The resolution would conclude by stating that If Saddam Hussein “adhered to these
conditions”, that would “lead to a new international relationship with Iraq”.
325.  Sir David told Dr Rice that force protection would be “a hard sell”. He had repeated
the need to have some “negotiating fat” in the draft resolution for Russia, which might
include force protection. Dr Rice agreed.
326.  Sir David reported that he had “welcomed the fact” that the US was “not now
thinking of stipulating regime change”. Dr Rice said that as they “had discussed before,
Saddam’s acceptance of the other conditions would lead to a radically different regime
anyway”. Sir David also said that there was a need to find a way to emphasise that the
“quarrel was with Saddam not the Iraqi people”; the “aim should be to isolate him, as we
had tried to isolate Milošević”. Dr Rice agreed.
327.  Sir David reported to Mr Blair:
“As I said to you afterwards, further encouragement. White House thinking about the
contents of the resolution has come back to earth and looks broadly plausible. And
their view of handling (a serious text, working with Putin etc) seems close to ours.
We must hope all this survives Cheney and the NSC meeting starting this evening.
But on this evidence, the Administration may now be ready to make a genuine effort
to go the UN route. Cementing this at Camp David will be a real prize.”106
106 Minute Manning to Prime Minister, 6 September 2002, ‘Iraq: Conversation with Condi Rice’.
151
Previous page | Contents | Next page