Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
could provide such a basis.” Unless there was “a proper legal basis for military action,
individual members of the Armed Forces and civilian officials … would also be potentially
liable to charges of murder.”
127.  Mr Wood warned that: “To advocate the use of force without a proper legal basis
is to advocate the commission of the crime of aggression, one of the most serious
offences under international law.” He also referred to the importance that: “HMG act
in accordance with international law, and not only because this is required by the
Ministerial Code.”41
128.  Mr Wright responded:
“… I work on the premise that if a question of military action arises, the Attorney
General’s opinion will be sought, in the light of the facts of the case … I can see no
other basis for current policy.”42
129.  On 20 August Lord Goldsmith, the Attorney General, wrote to Mr Powell
reminding him that they had talked about having a further conversation in September
(see Section 3.3).43 He would be away on an official visit until 8 September and it would
be helpful if they could start now to identify what timing Mr Powell had in mind.
130.  Lord Goldsmith also saw Mr Wood’s minute and noted that his advice on whether
force was justifiable or not would be an issue.44
131.  On 23 August, Mr McDonald wrote to Mr Wood stating that the Foreign Secretary
thought that this was “very serious” and would arrange to see the Attorney General.45
132.  Lord Goldsmith and Mr Straw discussed the legal issues on 23 September
(see Section 3.5).
133.  There is no indication that Lord Goldsmith and Mr Blair discussed Iraq before
22 October.
JIC Assessment, 21 August 2002
134.  A JIC Assessment of 21 August re‑affirmed that Saddam Hussein would
permit the return of inspectors if he believed that the threat of large‑scale military
action was imminent, but he would seek to frustrate their activities.
41 The Ministerial Code 2001 included the duty to comply with the law, including international law and treaty
obligations, to uphold the administration of justice and to protect the integrity of public life.
42 Manuscript comment Wright to Wood and all copy addressees, 15 August 2002, on Minute Wood to
Wright, 15 August 2002, ‘Iraq: Legality of use of Force’.
43 Letter Goldsmith to Powell, 20 August 2002, [untitled].
44 Manuscript comment Goldsmith to Brummell, 23 August 2002 on Minute Brummell to Attorney General,
22 August 2002, ‘Iraq: Legality of the Use of Force’.
45 Minute McDonald to Legal Advisers [FCO], 23 August 2002, ‘Iraq: Legality of Use of Force’.
116
Previous page | Contents | Next page