Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.4  |  Development of UK strategy and options, late July to 14 September 2002
119.  Secretary Powell said that:
“… war in Iraq would define the first term. He poured scorn on the hawks’ beliefs:
that a quick triumph was inevitable because Iraqis were waiting to be liberated; and
that victory in Iraq would help the MEPP and spread democracy in the region. What
would the Syrians and Iranians make of the US action – where next?”
120.  Asked where Mr Blair stood, Mr Straw replied:
“… if he had a free choice, the PM wanted to get rid of Saddam. But the more he
thought about it the more difficult it looked to the PM. He would stand by the US but
he was worried. The UN was the way through. An effort now could be a dry run for
later if military action were required. As the PM had said to him, the UN should be
seen as an opportunity, not an obstacle.”
121.  The record of the discussion was to be seen only by Sir David Manning and
Mr Blair.
122.  In his memoir, Mr Straw wrote:
“Not for the first time, and certainly not for the last, Colin opened up to me about his
intense frustration with parts of the Administration; in particular Dick Cheney and
Don Rumsfeld … I left the Hamptons pleased that Colin and I were in agreement
and hopeful that although it was going to take a great effort, we might be able to get
the Bush Administration to go to the UN.”39
The position at the end of August 2002
The legal view
123.  During August 2002, Mr Michael Wood, FCO Legal Adviser, continued to
express concerns about assumptions that, in the absence of an identified legal
basis, the UK would participate if military action was taken by the US.
124.  Lord Goldsmith remained concerned to address the issues.
125.  Mr Wood wrote to Mr Stephen Wright, FCO Deputy Under Secretary Defence and
Intelligence, and other senior colleagues on 15 August expressing concern that, while he
appreciated that no decision had been taken, “there appears to be an assumption that if
military action were taken by the US, we would not only support but participate”.40
126.  Mr Wood wrote that while it was “ultimately for the Attorney General to advise HMG
on matters of this importance”, he thought it would “be helpful” to colleagues to briefly
restate the legal position. He was “not, at present, aware of facts which would provide a
respectable legal basis for military action, though further action by the Security Council
39 Straw J. Last Man Standing: Memoirs of a Political Survivor. Macmillan, 2012.
40 Minute Wood to Wright, 15 August 2002, ‘Iraq: Legality of Use of Force’.
115
Previous page | Contents | Next page