Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around
the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route and no enthusiasm for
publishing material on the Iraqi regime’s record.”
Adm Boyce reported that Secretary Rumsfeld and President Bush would be
briefed by CENTCOM planners in early August. The US was examining two
military options, and saw the “UK (and Kuwait) as essential”. The three main
options for UK involvement were:
“(i) Basing in Diego Garcia and Cyprus plus […] SF squadrons.
(ii) As above, with maritime and air assets in addition.
(iii) As above, plus a land contribution of up to 40,000 perhaps with a discrete
role in northern Iraq entering from Turkey, tying down two Iraqi divisions.”
Mr Hoon said that the US had already begun “spikes of activity” to put pressure
on the regime. In his view, January was the most likely timing for military action.
Mr Straw stated that it “seemed clear” that President Bush had “made up his
mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case
was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability
was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran.” The UK “should work up a plan
for an ultimatum to Saddam” to allow the UN weapons inspectors back in to Iraq.
That would “help with the legal justification for the use of force”.
Lord Goldsmith warned that the desire for regime change was not a legal basis
for military action. Self-defence and humanitarian intervention could not be the
basis for military action in this case. Relying on resolution 1205 (1998) for UN
authorisation “would be difficult”. The situation “might of course change”.
Mr Blair stated: “it would make a big difference politically and legally if Saddam
refused to allow in the UN inspectors. Regime change and WMD were linked
in the sense that it was the regime that was producing the WMD. There were
different strategies for dealing with Libya and Iran. If the political context were
right, people would support regime change.”
Mr Blair added: “The two key issues were whether the military plan worked and
whether we had the political strategy to give the military plan the space to work.”
Adm Boyce did not yet know if the US battleplan was “workable”. There were
“lots of questions”, for example “the consequences if Saddam Hussein used
WMD on day one, or if Baghdad did not collapse and urban warfighting began”.
Mr Straw “thought the US would not go ahead with a military plan unless
convinced it was the winning strategy”, but there “could be US/UK differences”
on the political strategy. The ultimatum should be “discreetly” explored, despite
US resistance. Saddam Hussein would “continue to play hard-ball with the UN”.
Mr Scarlett assessed that “Saddam would allow the inspectors back in only
when he thought the threat of military action was real”.
Mr Hoon stated that, if Mr Blair wanted UK military involvement, an early
decision would be required. Mr Hoon cautioned that “many in the US did not
60
Previous page | Contents | Next page