Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.3  |  Development of UK strategy and options, April to July 2002
“Regional states would prefer UN inspections to a US-led attack on Iraq. Such
an attack would provoke large-scale protests across the Arab world. Jordan
would be particularly exposed to internal instability, but the Gulf States would
also be nervous. None of Iraq’s neighbours would regret Saddam’s overthrow
and none would provide practical … support for Iraq against a US-led attack.”
“There is consensus among Iraq’s neighbours that its territorial integrity must be
preserved, but there are great mutual suspicions and differences over the place
of the Kurds and the Shia in any new Iraqi regime, the regime’s nature and its
relationship with the West.”8
24.  Key points from the Assessment are set out in the Box below.
JIC Assessment, 19 April 2002: ‘Iraq: Regional Attitudes’
The Assessment stated:
“Arab attitudes towards Iraq, and particularly towards any prospective US-led attack,
are inextricably linked to bilateral relations with the US, events on the ground in the
Occupied Territories and perceived Western ‘double standards’ in favour of Israel
… We judge that, in the present circumstances, even the most pro-Western
Gulf States […] would find it politically impossible to support a US-led attack
on Iraq. We judge it unlikely that the current strong anti-US sentiment will
dissipate quickly. Only significant progress towards what the Arab world would see
as an equitable resolution of the Palestinian issue would mitigate this. Even if this
is achieved, recent events in the West Bank will make it harder in the medium-term
to win regional support for military action against Iraq.”
Iraq-related concerns had “dropped significantly down the Arab agenda” and Iraq was
“rarely perceived as the greatest security threat within the region”. The Gulf States saw
“Iran as the greater long-term threat and want an Iran-Iraq balance”.
The “conjunction of the threat of US military action and the pressure in the UN to permit
the return of weapons inspectors” had “led Iraq to pursue a revitalised foreign policy”.
That had included:
talks with the UN Secretary-General;
several attempts to win over its neighbours;
an Iraqi declaration at the Arab League Summit on 27 March 2002 that it
recognised Kuwait’s sovereignty and independence;
a marked decline in the number of militant attacks on Iran which suggested that
Iraq had “at least temporarily restrained the MEK [Mujahideen e Khalq]”; and
an Arab League resolution that its members would not support an outside attack
on any other member.
Iraq’s neighbours remained “suspicious of its intentions” and were “focused on
economic gains”.
8  JIC Assessment, 19 April 2002, ‘Iraq: Regional Attitudes’.
7
Previous page | Contents | Next page