Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
633.  Mr Blair’s subsequent statement to the House of Commons focused on the
discussions with President Bush on the crisis in the Middle East.
634.  On Iraq, Mr Blair reiterated his statements that decisions would be
“sensible”, and that the House of Commons would have a proper opportunity
to debate them before action was taken.
635.  Mr Blair assured Parliament that the question of whether action in respect
of Iraq would have the backing of international law would be considered “very
carefully”; but that the time to debate any legal basis was when such action
was taken.
636.  Mr Blair’s statement to the House of Commons on 10 April concentrated on the
crisis in the Middle East.241
637.  Addressing Iraq in the context of stability in the Middle East Mr Blair stated:
“There will be many occasions on which to debate Saddam Hussein’s flagrant
breach of successive UN resolutions on his weapons of mass destruction … [His]
regime is despicable, he is developing weapons of mass destruction, and we cannot
leave him doing so unchecked. He is a threat to his own people and to the region
and, if allowed to develop these weapons, a threat to us also.
“Doing nothing is not an option … [W]hat the international community should do
through the UN is challenge Saddam to let the inspectors back in without restriction
… If he really has nothing to hide, let him prove it.
“… no decisions on action have been taken. Our way of proceeding should be and
will be measured, calm and thought through. When judgements are made, I shall
ensure the House has a full opportunity to debate them.”
638.  Mr Charles Kennedy, Leader of the Liberal Democrats, stated that the issue of Iraq:
“… crosses the political spectrum – there is genuine unease in the Labour party,
among the Liberal Democrats and perhaps in sections of the Conservative party
… that unease is a reflection of genuine and sincerely held shades of opinion
throughout the country. Therefore, as a result of his discussions with President
Bush, will the Prime Minister acknowledge that no country can conduct a foreign
policy on the basis of ‘my ally, right or wrong’? Although I am not implying that the
Government are seeking to do so, there is a need for discernment. Many of us hope
that the Government may be able to temper some of the ideas of the American
Administration …”
241  House of Commons, Official Report, 10 April 2002, columns 22-38.
504
Previous page | Contents | Next page