Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, January to April 2002 – “axis of evil” to Crawford
639.  Mr Kennedy welcomed the fact that “if decisions on Iraq have to be reached at
some point in the future”, Mr Blair had confirmed the House of Commons would have
“an opportunity to debate the matter fully”.
640.  Mr Kennedy asked for confirmation that, if that stage was reached,
“incontrovertible evidence” would “be presented publicly, preferably at the level of
the United Nations Security Council”. That would be “most important, not just for
the legitimacy of any action under international law, but for maintaining a political
consensus”.
641.  Mr Blair replied:
“… Some people will be against taking action in respect of Iraq no matter what
it does, but I accept entirely that there are many people who are concerned …
whether that action will be sensible, whether it will have the backing of international
law and whether proper thought has been given to the consequences for the wider
region … [T]hose are questions that we shall consider very carefully …
“… most people would accept … Saddam Hussein does lead a despicable regime,
that he is a threat in respect of weapons of mass destruction and that it is important
that we deal with that threat …
“… it is the case that Saddam Hussein poses a threat. That is why the UN
resolutions are there … [T]his is somebody who has a track record of absolutely
extraordinary aggression on his neighbours, on his own people, on everyone that
he sees advantage in being aggressive towards … That is why British pilots are
still flying over the No-Fly Zone in order to protect people in Iraq. That is why the
inspectors went in, could not do their job properly and then came out.
“… in the end we can all respond to concerns but we have to take decisions on
them. I can assure people that those decisions will be sensible and that the House
will have a proper opportunity to debate them before we act upon them.
“I have never taken the view that we support the US right or wrong … But I do
believe … that the relationship is special and … that it is a fundamental part of
British foreign policy and should remain so. All I can say is that in my dealings with
the Administration and with this President, we have found them immensely open and
consultative, and where they have acted they have acted not just with consultation
but in what I would regard as a sensible way.”
642.  Mr Douglas Hogg (Conservative) asked Mr Blair to tell President Bush that “many
in this country are not yet persuaded that the threat posed by Saddam Hussein is
sufficiently great to justify military action, especially when the Middle East is in such
a turbulent state”.
643.  Mr Tam Dalyell (Labour) asked whether President Chirac (of France) had told
Mr Blair that he had taken “the thuggish young Vice-President of Iraq” [Saddam Hussein]
505
Previous page | Contents | Next page