Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“TB [Tony Blair] wanted to be in a position to give GWB [President Bush] a strategy
and influence it. He believed Bush was in the same position as him, that it would
be great to get rid of Saddam and could it be done without terrible unforeseen
circumstances? …
“We were given an account of the state of Iraqi forces, OK if not brilliant, the
opposition – hopeless – and Saddam’s ways – truly dreadful. CDS [Adm Boyce]
appeared to be trying to shape the meeting towards inaction, constantly pointing out
the problems, the nature of the administration, only Rumsfeld and a few others knew
what was being planned, TB may speak to Bush or Condi but did they really know
what was going on? … He said apart from Rumsfeld, there were only four or five
people who were really on the inside track.
“… but CDS would keep coming back to the problems … General Tony Pigott did
an OK presentation which went through the problems realistically but concluded
that a full-scale invasion would be possible, ending up with fighting in Baghdad. But
it would be bloody, could take a long time. Also, it was not impossible that Saddam
would keep all his forces back. He said post-conflict had to be part of conflict
preparation. The Americans believed we could replicate Afghanistan but it was very,
very different … [Lt Gen] Cedric [Delves] … said Tommy Franks [General Franks,
Commander in Chief CENTCOM] was difficult to read because he believed they
were planning something for later in the year, maybe New Year. He basically
believed in air power plus Special Forces. CDS said if they want us to be involved
in providing force, we have to be involved in all the planning, which seemed fair
enough.
“TB said it was the usual conundrum – do I support totally in public and help deliver
our strategy, or do I put distance between us and lose influence?
“We discussed whether the central aim was WMD or regime change. Pigott’s view
was that it was WMD. TB felt it was regime change in part because of WMD but
more broadly because of the threat to the region and the world … [P]eople will say
that we have known about WMD for a long time … [T]his would not be a popular
war, and in the States fighting an unpopular war and losing is not an option.
“C said that the Presidential Finding, based on an NSC paper, made clear it was
regime change that they wanted … There was a discussion about who would
replace Saddam and how could we guarantee it would be better. Scarlett said it
couldn’t be worse …”209
209  Campbell A & Hagerty B. The Alastair Campbell Diaries. Volume 4. The Burden of Power: Countdown
to Iraq. Hutchinson, 2012.
486
Previous page | Contents | Next page