Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, January to April 2002 – “axis of evil” to Crawford
action against Iraq was strong. A CNN poll earlier that week had shown 70 percent were
in favour of military action.
406.  Sir Christopher also reported that in discussions between the Foreign Affairs
Committee and a range of contacts in the US about “the need to make a solid case to
Europeans and others, the consensus response was that once the US showed it was
serious, other countries would come on board. But, equally, there was no sense that
serious military is action is imminent.”
Preparations for Crawford
FCO advice on the role of the Iraqi opposition and the history of
weapons inspections
407.  The FCO paper on the Iraqi opposition concluded that regime change led by
the external opposition was not a viable option and the most realistic successor
to Saddam Hussein would be a senior Sunni military or ex-military figure.
408.  The FCO explained that the provisions of resolution 1284 were ambiguous
because the P5 had been unable to reach agreement in 1999, and there had been
no progress on clarification since.
409.  There would be difficulties with securing agreement from Iraq, the US and
Russia on its implementation. The US could seek to raise the barrier for Iraqi
compliance; Russia was likely to take the opposite view. France might support the
UK because it saw agreement on a tough inspection regime as the only realistic
alternative to US military action.
410.  On 15 March, in response to Mr Blair’s request for further advice following his
meeting with Vice President Cheney on 11 March, the FCO sent Sir David Manning a
Research Analysts’ paper on the opposition and a separate note summarising the history
of attempts to get weapons inspectors back into Iraq.148
411.  The FCO Research Analysts’ paper on the nature and role of the opposition
to Saddam Hussein stated that the UK’s “ability to influence and/or direct the Iraqi
opposition” was “reliant on contacts with the external Iraqi community, while the internal
opposition remains closed to us”.149 The paper described the internal and external
opposition.
412.  The Research Analysts concluded:
“Various opposition groups … have told us of plans involving a national liberation
movement in which Iraqis, backed from the outside, would launch a series of attacks
148  Letter McDonald to Manning, 15 March 2002, ‘Iraq’.
149  Paper Research Analysts [FCO], 14 March 2002, ‘Iraq: The Nature and Role of the Opposition to
Saddam Hussein’.
459
Previous page | Contents | Next page