Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, January to April 2002 – “axis of evil” to Crawford
“Military action requires key allies, particularly in the region, to be on board.
That is why we see continuing with the UN route – i.e. ratcheting up pressure on
Iraq to comply with UN resolutions and allow weapons inspectors back in as a
necessary precursor. We doubt Saddam will co-operate but we must be seen to
have tried.”
“Also essential to alert sceptical world to the WMD threat … We are working on
evidence paper.”
“Meanwhile … should continue our efforts to get GRL implemented – will remind
international community that our quarrel is not with the Iraqi people.”
“… Introduction of revised sanctions regime will send an important signal of
Security Council unanimity. Thereafter focus will be on clarification of UNSCR
1284. We should use this to put pressure on Saddam to readmit inspections.”
“Consistent message we are getting from region and beyond is that if it is
decided to launch military action, that action must succeed in removing Saddam,
otherwise we will be worse off than we are now.”
“Issues arising from regime change on which I would welcome your thoughts:
{{Assessment of Iraqi Opposition …
{{Require serious movement on MEPP to give us space in which to act;
{{Day after issues loom large. Territorial integrity of Iraq important. Likely
replacement for Saddam – another Sunni strongman. Establishing
representative Government would require long term commitment;
{{Genuine consultation and construction of convincing legal basis will be
important …”130
353.  Mr Blair told Vice President Cheney on 11 March that it was “highly desirable
to get rid of Saddam”, and that the “UK would help” the US “as long as there was
a clever strategy”.
354.  That meant building up the case against Saddam carefully and intelligently;
putting him in the wrong place over inspections and compliance with UN Security
Council resolutions; and thereby helping to convince “international opinion to
rally to the idea of regime change” and avoiding unintended consequences.
355.  Mr Blair’s approach reflected a deliberate choice that the right way to
get close to the US in order to influence it was to offer the UK’s support for its
objectives.
356.  In his public statement after the meeting, Mr Blair emphasised that no
decisions had been taken.
130  Note FCO, ‘Visit of US Vice President Dick Cheney 11 March: Iraq’, attached to Letter McDonald to
Rycroft, 8 March 2002, ‘US Vice President’s Call on the Prime Minister, 11 March’.
449
Previous page | Contents | Next page